World Journal of Environmental Biosciences
World Journal of Environmental Biosciences
2023 Volume 12 Issue 4

Production and Cost of Chir-Pine Resin Tapping by Bore-Hole Method in Narendranagar Forest Division

 

Dharm Singh Meena1, Akash2*

 

1Department of Forest, Bhagirathi Circle, MuniKiReti, TehriGarhwal, Uttarakhand, India.

2Department of Botany, Dhanauri, P.G. College, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India.


Abstract

Oleoresin is a non-timber forest product of Pine around the world. Oleoresin is an abundant source of terpenes which generally has two major fractions namely turpentine and rosin. Turpentine is a volatile fraction whereas rosin is a solid fraction. Terpenes have great potential and conventional uses. The borehole method involves the drilling of holes in the stem of Pinus, spraying the chemical stimulants like sulphuric acid, nitric acid, and ethephon, and installation of an apparatus on which oleoresin is collected. We have selected the three compartments of Narendrangar forest division viz.Udkhanda Compartment No. 13, Fakot Compartment No.2, and Advani Compartment No.1 with a total of 240, 137, and 683 trees of  Pinus with varied diameter ranges of 70-80 cm, 60-70 cm, 50-60cm, 40-50cm, 30-40cm, 20-30,  in July, August and September. The total oleoresin production was 162.60 ltr in Udkhanda,  56.48 in Fakot, and 241.95 ltr in Advani. It was observed that 50-60 cm and 40-50 cm contributed the maximum yield with 15.55 Ltr.  and 14.52 Ltr oleoresin in all three  months  whereas in Fakhot and Advani, 40-50 cm and 50-60 cm diameterscontributed the maximum oleoresin production with  8.96,  7.57 Ltr and  33.52, 8.56 Ltr. yield.  Further, our results also showed that the production of oleoresin varied significantly in the bore-hole methodwith  8.36ltr  per tree as compared to the rill method with 2.36 Ltr in three months. The purity of yield also enhanced the rate of oleoresin which can be concluded that the bore-hole method can be implemented in all other forest divisions of Uttarakhand for sustainability and livelihood.

Keywords: Bore-hole, Oleoresin, Pinus, Narendranagar, Diameter ranges


Pinus roxburghiiis an important plant species from India thatcovers an area of 8900 km2 (Sharma, 2002). It is grown in Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal, Uttarakhand, and West Bengal. Itisgenerally found at an altitude of 450-2300 amsl in Uttarakhand. In Uttarakhand, It covers an area of 412,000 ha whereas in Himachal Pradesh 1,36000 ha (Anonymous, 1990).

The borehole method involves drilling holes in the stem of Pinus, spraying chemical stimulants like sulphuric acid and Ethephon, and installing an apparatus on which oleoresin is collected. After drilling the hole with a hand driver borer, polythene bags are attached for the collection of Oleoresin. There is no damage on the merchantable part of Pinus as the holes are near ground level resulting in less damage to the bark and cambium. The derivatives of Oleoresin are widely used in food industries, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and various industries thatmanufacture different products like varnishes, paint, aroma and flavor, food additives, cleaners, insecticides, and disinfectants (Swift, 2004). Oleoresin from Pine has been a widely used natural product by humans since ancient times. In ancient times, it was used in lighting, sealing, and in preserving wooden ships. Oleoresin obtained through the Borehole method is generally free from wastes and unnecessary particles. The rosin looks white whereas dark yellow in the traditional rill method. It was also observed that ahigher content of turpentine (32.3%) along with low ash content was observed in the borehole method. This method is new and highly standardized which involves the maximum number of resin ducts to open so large production, and improved quality can be obtained. It was observed from various studies that, tree crown, time of tapping, diameter growth rate, various environmental factors, stimulants, depth of boreholes, and diameter in pine affect the cost and oleoresin production (Verma & Pant, 1978; Hodges, 1996).

Bore-hole vsRill method

In recent times, new complementary products have been obtained from the plants by various scientific technologies through proper microbiological and pharmacological based study (Akash et al., 2020a). Plants provides various nutraceuticals, food supplements, nutraceuticals and different pharmaceuticals which has huge efficacy in disease treatment (Akash et al., 2020b). It is imperative for the new generation to scientifically explore floral diversity, design constructive strategies for sustainable utilization of forest based products  and conservation of forest flora (Mir et al., 2017). On the other hand, using the plants in an unsustainable manner led to the natural extinction of the species in different areas of the globe (Sharma et al., 2021). Oleoresin is the oldest NWFP used by human beingson a large scale for lighting (Snow, 1949), and in religious ceremonies by the people of Greece (Langenheim, 2003). The major causes of the decline of Pinus sp. were unscientific methods of tapping and frequent fire in the chir-pine forests which has caused heavy mortality of the trees. So it becomes imperative to search for an alternative. The high international demand for oleoresin has transformed the pine resin industry into a profitable business (Bohlmann & Keelong, 2008; da Silva Rodrigues et al., 2011). Unlike other crops,  the pine forest does not require any care, investment, or maintenance and it can be grown in high draught or low fertile soil. French cup and lip method  was famous for resin tapping in old times which deteriorated wood due to the deep cut on the tree which led to the breaking of trees. So, the Rill method came to a height to overcome this problem use but failed because a new rill was made after four days or at a weekly interval. Further excessive amounts of chemicals used in this method deteriorate resin quality and tree structure.

The borehole technique for resin tapping has been described by Hodges. In this method, firstly drilling of holes into wood takes place to open the resin ducts and oleoresin collected in a container. This method causes very little damage to the bark and cambium tissues. As soon as boreholes are covered by new cambium and bark growth. There is no damage on the bark of Pinus as the holes are near ground level resulting in less damage to the bark and cambium. Oleoresin obtained through the Borehole method is generally free from waster and unnecessary particles. The rosin looks white whereas dark yellow in the traditional rill method. This method has proved effective in the management and conservation of pine resources in India. Further, oleoresin obtained from this method is free from impurities resulting in the quality of turpentine, rosin, and other products manufactured from it being better and fetching higher market. In 1975-76, the production of oleoresin increased rapidly but it considerably decreased during 1990-91 up to 25,000 tons. The production was 5,000-30,000 tones during 1994-95 (Coppen & Hone, 1995). Studies also showed that the production increases greatly in the bore-hole method than in the rill method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in 2020 within Narendranagar Range of Narendranagar forest division, under Bhagirathi circle lies at 30° 29’ to 30° 3’ N latitude and 78° 10’ to 78° 53’E longitude (Figure 1). This forest division is located between the Alaknanda River in the east with the forest ranges of Rudraprayag Forest Division and by Mussoorie- Dehradun Forest Division in the West. Along with the Chir-pine, the area is occupied by Shorea- mallotus, Quarcus- Rhododendron community in which Chir-Pine has contributed 22977 ha. We have divided the forest of Chir-pine into diameter ranges of 70-80 cm,60-70 cm, 50-60cm, 40-50cm, 30-40cm, and 20-30,  in three months of July, August, and September for assessment of cost and production of Oleoresin. Hand driven drill bits of 1.00 inch, and 1.25 inch were made for drilling bore-hole. The chemical stimulant was sprayed and small pipes were fixed tightly in the holes which are attached to the plastic bags on which the oleoresin collected. For quantitive assessment, we have applied Pearson correlation and ANOVA by SPSS Version 20.

a)

b)

c)

d)

Figure 1. Oleoresin tapping by Bore-hole method in Narendranagar forest division, Uttarakhand

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Total Oleoresin production in three months

About 240 trees of Chir-pine in Udkhanda Compartment No.13, 137 in Fakot Compartment No.2, and 683 in Advani Compartment No.1 were involved in Oleoresin tapping in Narendranagar range. The total production was 162.60 ltr in Udkhanda, 56.48ltr in Fakot, and 241.95 ltr in Advani (Table 1).  The production of Oleoresin varied significantly in all the studied diameter ranges of 70-80 cm, 60-70 cm, 50-60cm, 40-50cm, 30-40cm, and 20-30,  in July, August, and September for selected trees. We have also recorded the data of the best 32 trees to determine the yield of oleoresin in the three compartments of the study area. In Uthkhanda compartment No. 13, the maximum yield was recorded in August with 43.06 ltr. followed by 13.80 ltr in July and 5.49 ltr. in September whereas in Fakot compartment No. 2, severe variation was recorded in the yield with 24.59 ltr. in August and 3.95 ltr. in September (Tables 3-5). In Advani compartment No.1, the maximum yieldwas obtained in August with a total production of 41.15 ltr. and 9.00 ltr. in September. Advani compartment No.1 and Fakot compartment No. 2 were two areas where no oleoresin was recorded in July.  Since the borehole method was first started in the Narendranagar range in July, so less production or nil yields were recorded in the study area. Results obtained from our study can be comparable with the study of Rai and Lekha, 2013 in the Chir-pine forest of Himachal Pradesh. Similar studies were also carried out by Murtem (1998), Singhal (1996), and Kaushal and Sharma (1988) from different Chir-pine forests of India with positive results in terms of oleoresin yield. ANOVA from our result revealed that oleoresin production varies significantly in three compartments viz. Udkhanda, Fakot and Advani (P>0.05) (Table 6). Pearson correlation test revealed that oleoresin production of Udkhanda was positively correlated with Fakhot (r = 0.99), and Advani (r = 0.99) and negatively correlated with the three months (r = -0.82) whereas oleoresin production in Fakhot was positively correlated with Udkhanda (r= 0.99), Advani (r = 0.99) and negatively correlated with the three all months (r = -0.77). In the case of Advani, oleoresin production is positively correlated withUdkhanda (r= 0.99), Fakhot (r= 0.99), Advani (r = 0.97) and negatively correlated with the three months (r = -0.85). The oleoresin production in all three months (July, August, and September) wasnegatively correlated with Udkhanda (r= -0.82), Fakhot (r= -0.77), and Advani (r = -0.85) (Table 2).

Table 1. Total Oleoresin production in the study area

Months

Advani (Ltr)

Fakot (Ltr)

Udkhanda (Ltr)

July

0.00

0.00

13.80

August

216.05

45.22

117.23

September

25.90

11.26

31.57

* Data from best trees of Chir-pine Viz.  240, 137, and 683 in the study area

Table 2. Pearson correlation two-tailed test between different sites of oleoresin production

Correlations

 

Udkhanda

Fakhot

Advani

Months

Udkhanda

PC

0.96

0.99

0.99

-0.82

Fakhot

PC

0.99

0.67

0.99

-0.77

Advani

PC

0.99

0.99

0.97

-0.85

Months

PC

-0.82

-0.77

-0.85

0.66

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

PC = Pearson Correlation

 

Table 3. Oleoresin production in Udkhanda, compartment No. 13

Tree diameter

(Cm)

Tree Number

Yield (Ltr)

July

Yield (Ltr)

August

Yield (Ltr)

September

30-40

01

1.60

1.18

0.35

40-50

02

1.40

2.46

0.16

50-60

03

1.00

1.29

0.14

40-50

04

1.60

1.75

0.06

60-70

05

0.60

1.85

0.12

30-40

06

1.50

1.05

0.21

50-60

07

1.70

0.40

0.22

50-60

08

0.90

3.10

0.43

40-50

09

0.80

0.57

0.14

60-70

10

0.60

0.80

0.05

30-40

11

0.80

0.21

0.05

50-60

53

0.80

0.58

0.26

40-50

60

0.50

1.92

0.17

70-80

16

-

1.32

0.07

40-50

19

-

1.39

0.07

60-70

20

-

1.49

0.06

60-70

24

-

1.00

0.16

50-60

25

-

1.25

0.14

40-60

26

-

1.76

0.08

60-70

27

-

1.59

0.55

60-70

28

-

1.62

0.11

30-40

49

-

1.15

0.12

50-60

54

-

1.32

0.19

40-50

58

-

1.01

0.14

20-30

59

-

1.56

0.19

40-50

60

-

1.92

0.17

50-60

64

-

1.59

0.08

30-40

67

 

1.89

0.10

30-40

76

-

1.19

0.23

30-40

77

-

1.53

0.08

50-60

92

-

1.32

0.35

70-80

93

-

1.36

0.24

 

Total

13.80

43.06

5.49

   * showing data of the best 32 trees of Chir- pine in the study area

Table 4. Oleoresin production in Fakot compartment No. 2

Tree diameter

(Cm)

Tree Number

Yield (Ltr)

July

Yield (Ltr)

August

Yield (Ltr)

September

50-60

01

-

1.35

0.85

60-70

02

-

1.17

0.62

60-70

03

-

1.00

0.65

40-50

04

-

0.68

0.01

50-60

05

-

0.10

0.030

60-70

06

-

0.20

0.35

40-50

07

-

0.40

0.04

50-60

08

-

0.30

0.03

40-50

09

-

0.10

0.03

50-60

10

-

0.50

0.04

40-50

11

-

0.20

0.05

40-50

12

-

2.50

0.04

30-40

13

-

0.10

0.03

40-50

14

-

0.20

0.03

30-40

15

-

0.40

0.04

40-50

16

-

1.40

0.22

40-50

17

-

0.50

0.03

40-50

18

-

0.70

0.04

60-70

19

-

0.30

0.02

30-40

20

-

0.60

0.18

40-50

21

-

0.65

0.06

30-40

22

-

0.40

0.02

30-40

23

-

0.90

0.04

50-60

25

-

1.00

0.02

30-40

29

-

1.20

0.10

50-60

30

-

1.02

0.04

50-60

37

-

1.12

0.04

60-70

43

-

1.30

0.02

50-60

53

-

1.00

0.13

30-40

54

-

1.00

0.04

30-40

56

-

2.00

0.04

30-40

74

-

0.30

0.07

 

Total

 

24.59

3.95

* showingdata of the best 32 trees of Chir- pine in the study area

Table 5. Oleoresin production in Advani compartment No.1

Tree diameter

(Cm)

Tree Number

Yield (Ltr)

July

Yield (Ltr)

August

Yield (Ltr)

September

50-60

04

-

1.00

0.10

40-50

28

-

1.60

0.20

60-70

38

-

1.00

0.20

40-50

41

-

1.40

0.20

50-60

47

-

1.00

0.10

40-50

55

-

1.40

0.20

40-50

77

-

1.00

0.20

40-50

79

-

1.20

0.20

30-40

131

-

1.10

0.02

40-50

139

-

2.00

0.15

40-50

147

-

2.20

0.10

60-70

169

-

1.10

0.10

40-50

177

-

1.10

0.10

40-50

200

-

1.30

0.10

40-50

245

-

1.10

0.15

60-70

253

-

1.10

0.15

40-50

261

-

1.70

0.05

40-50

272

-

1.20

0.15

40-50

273

-

1.30

0.15

30-40

280

-

1.10

0.15

50-70

286

-

1.70

0.15

40-50

288

-

1.50

0.15

50-60

296

-

1.60

0.15

40-50

381

-

1.60

0.15

40-50

383

-

0.65

5.00

40-50

390

-

1.00

0.02

50-60

406

-

1.20

0.15

40-50

418

-

1.10

0.10

40-50

493

-

1.10

0.15

30-40

577

-

1.20

0.05

40-50

601

-

1.20

0.15

50-60

627

-

1.40

0.01

 

Total

 

41.15

9.00

* showing data of the best 32 trees of Chir- pine in the study area

Table 6. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) between different sites of oleoresin production

 

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Udkhanda

Between Groups

22.003

1

22.003

3.288

**0.144

Within Groups

26.766

4

6.691

 

 

Total

48.769

5

 

 

 

Fakot

Between Groups

9.275

1

9.275

1.263

**0.324

Within Groups

29.373

4

7.343

 

 

Total

38.648

5

 

 

 

Advani

Between Groups

9.830

1

9.830

1.389

**0.304

Within Groups

28.311

4

7.078

 

 

Total

38.142

5

 

 

 

*= Significant, ** = Non significant, **

[Significant (P<0.05), NS = Non significant (P>0.05)]

Effect of diameter on Oleoresin production

The production of Oleoresin is highly influenced by the chemical stimulants used, bore-hole diameter, and depth (Kumar & Sharma, 2005; Lekha & Sharma, 2005). The oleoresin production is highly affected by treatments for borehole diameter, depth, and chemical stimulants (Kumar & Sharma, 2005; Lekha & Sharma, 2005). The diameter in all the parameters playsa significant role in oleoresin production (Table 7). There is a significant difference has been observed in oleoresin production in different diameter ranges in the present study area. In all three compartments, Udkhanda has contributed178.55 ltr of oleoresin followed by Advani  (50.18 ltr) and Fakot with 28.54 ltr. A diameter range of 60-70 cm has contributed to the maximum oleoresin production with 125.44 ltr in Udkhanda, 7.88ltr. in Fakot, and 34.35 ltr. in Advani by diameter range of 40-50 cm. We have also recorded the seasonal variation in oleoresin production potential in different studied diameter ranges. In Udkhanda,  50-60 cm, and 40-50 cm contributed the maximum yield with 15.55 ltr. and 14.52 ltroleoresin in all three months whereas in Fakhot and Advani, 40-50 cm and 50-60 cm diameter contributed the maximum oleoresin production with 8.96,7.57 ltr and 33.52, 8.56 ltr. yield. This could be due to the high number of resin ducts in the trees of these diameter ranges. Our results can be comparable with the study of Chaudhari et al. (1992), and Kaushal and Sharma (1988), who have reported the best yield of oleoresinin these diameter ranges of Pinus roxburghii. ANOVA revealed that oleoresin production variedsignificantly in all three months (P<0.05) respective to the different diameter ranges involved in the study.

Table 7. Diameter ranges contributed best oleoresin production

Tree diameter

(Cm)

Yield (Ltr)

Udkhanda

Yield (Ltr)

Fakot

Yield (Ltr)

Advani 1

20-30

1.75

-

-

30-40

13.24

7.46

3.62

40-50

18.07

7.88

34.35

50-60

17.06

7.57

8.56

60-70

125.44

5.63

3.65

70-80

2.99

-

-

Total

178.55

28.54

50.18

Oleoresin production in Bore-holeand Rill method

Bore-hole techniques have huge advantages in terms of the Superiority of oleoresin as it is collected in a closed-packed container. In this, method, rosin and turpentine obtained are much better than the rill method and hence can be sold atgreat prices (Lekha & Sharma, 2005). We have made a comparison of Oleoresin production between these two methods in three compartments of Narendranagar forest division in three months which resulted in Advani, with the highest production of with 3.03ltr/per tree followed by 3.01ltr/per tree in Udkhanda, and 2.32 ltr/per tree of oleoresin in Fakot. The production data of our result also show a positive and significant relation with the study of Rawat, (2000) in Pinus roxburhii, McReynolds and Kossuth, 1984 in Pinus elliottii, and Hodges and Johnson (1997) in Pinus elliottii.

Effect of chemical stimulant on oleoresin yield

In Pinus, resin is produced and complex network radial and axial resin duct is responsible for its storage and through which it flow (Vázquez-González et al., 2020). In the present study, chemical stimulants like sulphuric acid and nitric acid were sprayed simultaneously to increase oleoresin production. 213 ml sulphuric acid + 787 ml water and 370 ml Nitric acid +630 ml water were prepared in a different container which was further used for the borehole. Although we didn’t change the concentration of the chemical but recorded data with the same concentration of both the stimulants. It was also evident from the studies of Sharma and Lekha, 2013, that adding sulphuric acid as a chemical stimulant has significantly increased the production of oleoresin. Increasing the concentration ofsulphuric acid, the oleoresin yield is also increased. This might be because sulphuric acid increases the production by prolonging flow to reduce the turgescence of various epithelial cells due to tapping injury, preventing crystallization of resin ducts and formation of tylosiods (Kossuth, 1984). The increasing yield of oleoresin by using sulphuric acidhas also been reported by Lohani (1984), Ribas et al. (1986), and McReynolds and Kossuth (1985). An alternative of Nitric acid and ethephon was also added as a chemical stimulant by Sharma and Lekha, 2013 in which significant oleoresin yield was recorded in Himachalpradesh with the highest 1780 g/hole/tree at the 10 percent ethephon + 20 percent H2SO4 concentration. The study of McReynolds and Kossuth (1985) also recorded high oleoresin production in Pinus elliottiiwith 50% H2SO4 + 10 percent ethephon while Vankaiah (1991), 5 percent ethephon+ 20 % H2SO4 mixture in Pinus roxburghii. Further, It was also evident from various study that  resin yield varied across the season (Lombardero et al., 2000; Hood & Sala, 2015; Neis et al., 2018; Zas et al., 2020) which need to be checked more.

 

CONCLUSION

Pinus roxburghii (Chir-pine) is an important source of oleoresin in Uttarakhand. It was concluded from our results that oleoresin production depends on the techniques used in tapping. The Bore-hole method can play a huge role in terms of high production, purity, and cost of resin. Further study also suggests that different concentrations of chemical stimulants can be used when the environmental conditions are unfavorable. Our study also showed that the production potential of oleoresin associated with the diameter of trees like 40-50 cm and 50-60 has made a significant contribution to yield. So as per the trail, we can select only those trees with diameter ranges 40-60 Cm which have great potential foroleoresin production. This will also ensure that no harm should be done to other Chir-Pine trees. The results also indicated that higher yield and good cost of resin tapping can be achieved by using the bore-hole as an alternate method along with managing the subset of Pinus trees based on different diameter classes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: All the authors are grateful to the locals, forest officials for their help during the field work.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: Special thanks to forest department for financial support

ETHICS STATEMENT: None

References

Akash, Navneet, & Bhandari, B. S. (2020a). Ethnomedicinal plant use and practice in praditional medicine. IGI Global, USA, 1-300. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1320-0

Akash, Navneet, Bhandari, B. S., Bisht, S. S., & Mansotra, D. K. (2020b). Ethnobotany: The traditional medical science for alleviating human ailments and suffering. Ethnomedicinal Plant Use and Practice in Traditional Medicine (pp. 38-57), IGI Global USA.

Anonymous. (1990). Himachal pradesh forest statistics. Department of Forest Farming Conservation, Shimla. 229.

Bohlmann, J., & Keeling, C. I. (2008). Terpenoid biomaterials. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology54(4), 656-669. 

Chaudhari, D. C., Goel, C. L., Joshi, B. D., Uniyal, D. N., Amba Prasad, A. P., & Bist, R. S. (1992). Correlation between diameter and resin yield by rill method of tapping. Indian Forester, 118(7), 456-459.

Coppen, J. J. W., & Hone, G. A. (1995). Non-wood forest products. Vol. 2. Natural Resources Institute, FAO, Rome, Italy.

da Silva Rodrigues, K. C., Apel, M. A., Henriques, A. T., & Fett-Neto, A. G. (2011). Efficient oleoresin biomass production in pines using low cost metal containing stimulant paste. Biomass and Bioenergy35(10), 4442-4448.

Hodges, A. W. (1996). Management strategies for a borehole resin production systems in slash pine. Dissertation submitted to Univeristy of Florida, Gainesville, FI.

Hodges, A. W., & Johnson, J. D. (1997). Borehole oleoresin production from slash pine. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry21(3), 108-115.

Hood, S., & Sala, A. (2015). Ponderosa pine resin defenses and growth: metrics matter. Tree Physiology35(11), 1223-1235.

Kaushal, A. N., & Sharma, K. R. (1988). Tapping of resin in chir and blue pine. Bulletin No. RT1, 19-26.

Kossuth, S. V. (1984). Multipurpose slash pine: Genetics and physiology of gum naval stores production. USDA Forest Service general technical report NE-United States, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.

Kumar, R., & Sharma, K. R. (2005). Standardization of borehole method of oleoresin tapping in blue pine (Pinus wallichiana AB Jackson). Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products12(4), 177-181.

Langenheim, J. H. (2003). Plant resins: Chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Oregon, US: Timber Press.

Lekha, C., & Sharma, K. R. (2005). Borehole method of oleoresin tapping in chirpine (Pinus roxburghiiSargent). Forest Chemicals Review, 115(3), 11-17.

Lohani, D. N. (1984). Resin tapping research–A review of past work and the current approach. In Proc. 1st For. Conf. Dehradun (pp. 649-656).

Lombardero, M. J., Ayres, M. P., Lorio Jr, P. L., & Ruel, J. J. (2000). Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecology Letters, 3(4), 329-339.

McReynolds, R. D., & Kossuth, S. V. (1985). CEPA in liquid sulfuric acid increases oleoresin yields. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry9(3), 170-173.

Mir, M. A., Shafi, A., & Zahoor, I. (2017). RAPD based molecular characterization of lavatera cachemiriana cambess. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 2(1), 377-383.

Murtem, G. (1998). Studies on the effect of morphological parameters on oleoresin yield in chirpine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent) [MSc. (Forestry) Thesis]. Dr. YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan.

Neis, F. A., de Costa, F., Fuller, T. N., de Lima, J. C., da Silva Rodrigues-Correa, K. C., Fett, J. P., & Fett-Neto, A. G. (2018). Biomass yield of resin in adult Pinus elliottii Engelm. trees is differentially regulated by environmental factors and biochemical effectors. Industrial Crop and Products, 118, 20-25.

Rawat, G. S. (2000). Borehole resin tapping in chir pine (Pinus roxburghii). Indian Forester126(6), 595-602.

Ribas, C., Assini, J. L., Garrido, L. M. A. G., & Gurgel Garrido, L. M. A. (1986). Resin tapping in Pinus elliottii: Effect of the quality of sulfuric acid on resin production and on the height of face. Boletim Tecnico Instituto Florestal Sao Paulo, 40, 537-544.

Sharma, A., Dubey, V. K., Johnson, J. A., Rawal, Y. K., & Sivakumar, K. (2021). Is there always space at the top? Ensemble modeling reveals climate-driven high-altitude squeeze for the vulnerable snow trout Schizothorax richardsonii in Himalaya. Ecological Indicators120, 106900.

Sharma, O. P. (2002). Efficient resin tapping and its processing in himachal pradesh: An overview. Indian Forester, 128(4), 371-378.

Singhal, V. (1996). Screening of Chirpine half-sib progenies for economically important traits [Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis]. University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Snow, A. G. (1949). Research on the improvement of turpentine practices. Economic Botany3(4), 375-394.

Swift, K. A. (2004). Catalytic transformations of the major terpene feedstocks. Topics in Catalysis27(1-4), 143-155.

Vázquez-González, C., Zas, R., Erbilgin, N., Ferrenberg, S., Rozas, V., & Sampedro, L. (2020). Resin ducts as resistance traits in conifers: Linking dendrochronology and resin-based defences. Tree physiology40(10), 1313-1326.

Venkaiah, K. (1991). Ethephon in liquid sulphuric acid increases oleoresin yields in chir pine. Indian Forester, 117(2), 120-123.

Verma, V. P. S., & Pant, S. P. (1978). Effect of width of blaze and stimulant (in resin tapping) on the growth of chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent)Indian Forester, 104(1), 36-41.

Zas, R., Touza, R., Sampedro, L., Lario, F. J., Bustingorri, G., & Lema, M. (2020). Variation in resin flow among Maritime pine populations: Relationship with growth potential and climatic responses. Forest Ecology and Management474, 118351.

 

 
 

 


Copyright © 2024 - World Journal of Environmental Biosciences - All Rights Reserved Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.