World Journal of Environmental Biosciences
World Journal of Environmental Biosciences
2025 Volume 14 Issue 4

Hydrogeological and Hydrochemical Characteristics of Groundwater in Western Kazakhstan Used for Pasture Watering


, , , , , , , , ,
  1. Industrial and Technological Institute, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University, Kazakhstan.
  2. National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan.
  3. Institute of Veterinary Science and Agricultural Technology, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University, Kazakhstan.
  4. Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Water Management LLP, Kazakhstan.
  5. Polytechnic Institute, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University, Kazakhstan.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate groundwater sources potentially suitable for pasture watering. This paper presents the results of studies of groundwater sources used for pasture watering. An analysis of the hydrochemical parameters of groundwater in the western region used for watering pasturelands was carried out. The article examines the state of pasture watering with groundwater in the West Kazakhstan, Atyrau, and Mangystau regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The hydrochemical analysis of water was carried out using chemical and physicochemical methods. The scientific and practical significance of the study lies in the fact that, under current conditions, fundamentally sound solutions are needed for the fullest possible use of aquifers for pasture watering, based on the study of the hydrodynamic characteristics of aquifer strata and advances in well drilling. The significance of the hydrogeological studies conducted on the water supply of pasture areas lies in the fact that restoration of the destroyed pasture water infrastructure and the wide use of explored groundwater reserves will make it possible to significantly increase the economic efficiency of transhumant livestock husbandry.


Keywords: Western Kazakhstan, Transhumant livestock husbandry, Pasture, Pasture watering, Groundwater sources

INTRODUCTION

Agriculture is the world’s largest water-consuming sector, and more than one-third of agricultural water is used for livestock production (Heinke et al., 2020; Rafiei et al., 2022). In many climatic zones, the water requirements of cattle are met by precipitation, associated water available on pastures, and surface runoff (Zeydalinejad et al., 2023; Karimi et al., 2024; Thamaga et al., 2024). However, in arid areas, such as the semi-arid parts of the United States of America, South America, and Australia, groundwater is an important source of water for livestock grazing because it is virtually unaffected by changes in surface hydrology. Although cattle drinking water consumption may seem insignificant on a global scale, it can represent a substantial share of extraction at the regional level (Gleeson et al., 2020; Zwarteveen et al., 2021; Sarami-Foroushani et al., 2024). For example, in the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) in Queensland, Australia, livestock grazing is the main type of land use, and groundwater extraction to support it, including drinking water for cattle and domestic use, is estimated at 50% of total water extraction. Pressure on global freshwater resources is projected to increase due to rising meat consumption as population grows, economic prosperity increases, and awareness of the impacts of climate change expands (Wu et al., 2020; Rochford et al., 2023). Groundwater constitutes approximately 30% of global freshwater reserves and is a crucial source for domestic, agricultural, and industrial needs; in many regions, especially semi-arid ones, groundwater is often the last available source of fresh water (Frappart & Merwade, 2022; Costa et al., 2025). Groundwater is one of the most important resources that can be brought into use rapidly; it does not require treatment and has been used from past to present to meet drinking, municipal, irrigation, and industrial water demands (Aslan & Sepetcioglu, 2025). Vast areas of deserts and semi-deserts in Kazakhstan, occupying about 60% of the total territory of the republic and used mainly as natural autumn-winter pastures for transhumant livestock husbandry, can in most cases be transformed into valuable highly productive agricultural land with developed pasture management on the basis of the enormous groundwater reserves available there (Dar et al., 2021; Ongayev et al., 2021; Ongayev et al., 2022; Di Fiore et al., 2024; Elerian et al., 2024; Haddad et al., 2024; Petrova et al., 2024; Todayama et al., 2024; Zakaev et al., 2024; Zar et al., 2024; Huang, 2025; Rivas & Munoz, 2025; Welie & Liesbeth, 2025). The huge resources of artesian basins and groundwater flows make it possible, by means of boreholes and wells, to bring groundwater to the surface almost anywhere within pasture territories and to use it locally without major water transfers, with minimal expenditure of funds and time (Nasiyev et al., 2021; Sepahvand et al., 2025).

This article examines the distribution of groundwater within the western region of the country. Its similarity to the above-mentioned articles lies in the research objects. However, this article focuses on the provision of pasture areas in the western regions with groundwater. The presence of groundwater is confirmed by survey data from the territories of these regions. The Republic of Kazakhstan possesses vast pasture areas, the modern and proper development and water supply (pasture watering) of which constitutes a crucial element in the problem of developing modern livestock husbandry and meeting the needs of the country’s growing population and its export potential for high-quality and environmentally safe meat products (Nasiyev et al., 2023; Ongayev et al., 2023; Yadav et al., 2023; Ongayev et al., 2024). Thus, the purpose of the article was to investigate the distribution of groundwater sources used for pasture watering in Western Kazakhstan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and survey design

The objects of the study were underground sources used for pasture watering at the locations of transhumant livestock husbandry in the West Kazakhstan, Atyrau, and Mangystau regions. A hydrogeological survey of pasturelands was conducted to determine the actual state of water resources by examining groundwater intake facilities. In the West Kazakhstan Region, data from 503 dug wells and 372 boreholes surveyed during the reporting period were analyzed together with materials from our own studies and data obtained through design and survey organizations and executive bodies. In the Atyrau Region, data from 148 dug wells and 18 boreholes were analyzed. In the Mangystau Region, data from 28 dug wells and 45 boreholes were analyzed.

 

Water sampling and hydrochemical analysis

Water samples from underground water sources were collected in accordance with the regulatory document “Nature Protection. Hydrosphere. Devices and Equipment for Sampling, Primary Processing, and Storage of Natural Water Samples,” which is regulated in the Republic of Kazakhstan for collecting water samples from sources. The location of the sampling site was recorded using GPS. Water samples were collected in plastic bottles thoroughly rinsed with water. If the delivery of samples to the laboratory was delayed for more than 24 hours, the water samples were preserved. Samples intended for cation analysis were preserved with 1 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO₃) to maintain the ions in solution.

Chemical analysis of the water samples was carried out at the accredited testing center of the Science Department of Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University and at the laboratory of Zhaiykhydrogeology LLP. Hydrochemical water analysis was performed using chemical and physicochemical methods in accordance with standard testing methods. Sulfates were determined by the spectrophotometric method; pH, by the potentiometric method; nitrogen-containing substances, sodium, and potassium, by the photometric method; and calcium, magnesium, carbonates, bicarbonates, and chlorides, by the titrimetric method.

 

Hydrogeological characteristics of the study regions

West Kazakhstan Region. The region is predominantly flat, with spurs of the General Syrt and the Cis-Ural Plateau in the north and northeast, while most of the territory is occupied by the Caspian Lowland. Groundwater is mainly associated with marine deposits of Caspian transgressions, where strong salinization and poor leaching result in high mineralization. Additional aquifers occur in Pliocene sandy deposits, Upper Cretaceous Maastrichtian strata, aeolian sands of the Naryn massif, and river alluvium.

Atyrau Region. Groundwater resources include pore waters in Quaternary deposits and confined artesian waters in pre-Quaternary, mainly Upper Albian, strata. The region lies within the Caspian Lowland, a marine accumulative plain composed of Neogene and Quaternary sediments. Important aquifers are developed in aeolian sands, alluvial valleys, and lacustrine and marine deposits. In the Ural-Emba plain, discontinuity of the regional aquiclude improves groundwater circulation and recharge from adjacent artesian basins (Al-Jassim et al., 2024; Guillen & Pereira, 2024; Kyaw et al., 2024; Murphy et al., 2024; Park, 2024; Clark & Foster, 2025; Coleman et al., 2025; King et al., 2025; Tan et al., 2025; Toktogonov et al., 2025).

Mangystau Region. Located on the Mangystau Plateau, the region combines northern salt marshes with southern uplands, including the Ustyurt Plateau and the Mangystau Mountains. Its hydrogeology is represented by several artesian basins, with the main aquifers associated with Quaternary aeolian sands and marine formations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Aquifers of marine deposits related to the Caspian transgressions (Post-Khvalynian, Khvalynian, Khazarian, and Baku) are widely distributed in the West Kazakhstan Region. The waters occur at depths from 3–5 m in depressions (hollows, sandy plains, etc.) to 15–20 m in elevated areas. In the pre-Syrt plains, the waters are encountered at depths of 7–25 m (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Hydrogeological characteristics of the surveyed underground water sources from aquifers in the West Kazakhstan Region

Aquifers

Well type

Number

Depth, m

Static level, m

Yield, dm³/s

Mineralization, g/dm³

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Modern aeolian

dug well

89

1,8-6,8

0,5-6

0,02-1,46

0,2-9,6

Middle–Upper Quaternary alluvial

dug well

7

4,3-8

1,9-5,4

0,28-0,52

0,4-10,1

borehole

14

14-38

3,1-6

0,13-1,4

0,6-3,1

Lower–Upper Quaternary alluvial-deltaic

dug well

4

4,8-9,5

3-8

1,49-2,09

0,3-0,6

borehole

13

28-50

3-4,8

1,1-4

0,18-4,2

Upper Quaternary marine Khvalynian, Lower–Middle Quaternary marine Baku-Khazarian

dug well

374

2-26

1-18

0,01-1,98

0,1-18,5

borehole

138

8-41

2,3-14

0,02-2,6

0,16-19,9

Locally water-bearing Lower–Middle Quaternary deluvial

dug well

1

19

10,5

2,2

0,5

borehole

7

12-25,5

3-10,5

0,05-2,5

0,8-3,6

Locally water-bearing Lower–Upper Quaternary horizon of the upper part of the Syrt sequence (QI-IIIsr3)

borehole

6

33-43

7-16

0,5-1,24

2,8-8,5

Upper Pliocene sub-Syrt

dug well

28

4-21,58

3-15,5

0,02-1,38

0,4-10,5

borehole

80

21-93

2-42

0,3-3

0,2-13,9

Upper Pliocene Akchagyl

borehole

36

22,2-120

2,8-28

0,3-5,1

0,3-10

Upper Pliocene Apsheron

borehole

68

30-80

2-44

0,06-3,5

0,5-41,3

Upper Cretaceous Maastrichtian

borehole

10

38-60

3-43

0,02-3

0,47-9,1

 

 

Fresh and slightly brackish waters, with salinity of 1–3 g/L, formed by infiltration of atmospheric precipitation, occur mainly along the outer margin of the Caspian Lowland at depths of 2–10 m over an area of approximately 40–50 thousand km². Here, borehole yields do not exceed 0.01–0.5 L/s but in some places reach 1–2 L/s with a drawdown of 1–3 m. In the central part of the lowland, slightly mineralized waters occur as lenses 0.2–1.5 m thick and 0.1–2 km long.

Within the General Syrt and Trans-Ural Syrt, the mineralization of waters in Pliocene deposits ranges from 0.5 to 5 g/L, in some places reaching 8–10 g/L. Their chemical composition varies from bicarbonate and sulfate-chloride calcium-sodium to sodium chloride. The yields of boreholes penetrating water-bearing sands range from tenths of a unit to 1–2 and, more rarely, 3–5 m/s with water-level drawdowns of 1–35 m. In the remaining areas of the pre-Syrt plains, where polymictic sands with interbeds of gravel and pebbles are widespread, borehole yields reach 8–10 L/s with a drawdown of 6–10 m. In the Caspian Lowland, saline waters are widespread throughout the Pliocene deposits. From the margin toward the central part of the lowland, a regular increase in groundwater mineralization is observed, from 5–15 to 20–80 g/L. In terms of chemical composition, these waters are mainly sodium chloride, and only locally chloride magnesium- or calcium-sodium.

On the watershed plains of the Ural-Emba Plateau, waters of the marl-chalk horizon are penetrated by boreholes at depths of 10–60 m; borehole productivity varies from 0.3 to 4.5 L/s with drawdowns of 3–7 m. In the pre-Syrt areas, groundwater is encountered by boreholes at depths of 30–100 m and more, with productivity from 1–3 to 10–15 L/s. Water mineralization is highly variable. In the Syrt zones, it does not exceed 1–3 g/L. In terms of chemical composition, these are mixed bicarbonate-chloride calcium and sodium waters. From north to south and from east to west, the total dissolved solids increase, and already in the western part of the chalk plateau and in the south of the General Syrt, they reach 7–10 g/L or more.

Unconfined groundwater in sands occurs at depths of 1–3 m in deflation hollows, on interdune and interridge plains, and in sor depressions and at 5–15 m beneath ridges and dunes. In all sandy massifs, with slight deepening of the water-receiving part of wells into the aquifer, yields of 0.05–0.5 L/s were obtained.

The presence of loose, highly permeable sands promotes the rapid infiltration, especially in non-stabilized areas, of a significant portion of winter-spring atmospheric precipitation and the formation of fresh and slightly brackish groundwater. The least mineralized waters, with total dissolved solids mainly up to 1 and more often 0.5 g/L, are developed in the northern half of the Naryn massif and in the Buldurty-Kaldygayty sands. Here, fresh waters are almost continuously distributed and have significant thickness (3–10 m). In other areas, however, waters with mineralization from 2 to 10 g/L are predominant in sandy massifs. Fresh waters occur here as lenses floating on the surface of saline and brackish water. Under sors and salt marshes, water mineralization varies from 10 to 50 g/L and more. Fresh waters with mineralization up to 1 g/L are mainly bicarbonate or sulfate-bicarbonate calcium and sodium in chemical composition. Among waters of elevated mineralization (2–10 g/L), chloride-sulfate and chloride-sodium varieties predominate, often of mixed composition. Chloride sodium waters are developed on interdune-interridge plains.

The discharges of watering points in valleys and ravines vary from 1 to 8 L/s with drawdowns of 5–9 m. Especially low yields of 0.5–0.2 L/s are observed in the lower reaches of river valleys in the Caspian Lowland. The mineralization and chemical composition of groundwater are rather varied. In river valleys, groundwater in alluvial deposits is almost everywhere fresh, with total dissolved solids of 0.2–1 g/L, while in the lower reaches it ranges from 1 to 5 g/L or more. Water mineralization also increases downstream. Elevated and high groundwater mineralization (5–15 g/L) is also observed in the valleys of some river tributaries, where saline waters from underlying deposits are discharged along tectonic faults. In terms of chemical composition, the waters are mainly bicarbonate and bicarbonate-sulfate calcium or sodium; brackish waters are sulfate-chloride and chloride sodium, while slightly saline waters are chloride sodium.

A special position is occupied by groundwater horizons in the so-called flood-spread areas, which are alluvial-deltaic depressions with numerous river channels and lakes. Groundwater in them is confined to clayey fine-grained sands and sandy loams 3–8 m thick, and its level occurs at depths up to 3–5 m. The salt composition of groundwater is varied. Chloride sodium waters with mineralization of 10–50 g/L predominate. Only in the most drained and desalinated areas are fresh and slightly brackish waters formed, with total dissolved solids up to 3 g/L. Water reserves are limited. Freshwater lenses 0.5–0.7 m thick float on denser saline waters.

The waters of the Upper Pliocene sub-Syrt aquifer, the Middle–Upper Quaternary alluvial aquifer, the water-permeable modern aeolian horizon, the Lower–Upper Quaternary alluvial-deltaic aquifer, the locally water-bearing Lower–Middle Quaternary deluvial horizon, and the locally water-bearing Lower–Upper Quaternary horizon of the upper part of the Syrt sequence (QI-IIIsr3) are most often bicarbonate calcium or sulfate waters (Figure 1).

 

 

Figure 1. Hydrochemical characteristics of water from the surveyed boreholes and wells in the West Kazakhstan Region

 

 

The water chemistry of the Upper Cretaceous Maastrichtian aquifer depends on the degree of protection of the horizon and may vary from fresh bicarbonate waters to brackish sulfate waters. The diagram data show significant variability in aquifer composition, ranging from relatively fresh bicarbonate waters to brines dominated by chlorides and sodium. Most samples from all horizons show high concentrations of sodium and potassium. For example, in the Upper Quaternary marine Khvalynian horizon, the values reach 31,164 mg/L, indicating extremely high marine-type mineralization. Chloride waters are dominant in marine horizons (Khvalynian, Baku-Khazarian), where chloride concentrations reach 4,180–5,431 mg/L. Most samples show high concentrations of chlorides (often more than 1,000–3,000 mg/L) and sulfates (up to 3,000 mg/L and above), which is characteristic of deep or marine aquifers (Khvalynian, Baku-Khazarian). High sulfate contents (above 1,000–2,000 mg/L) were recorded in the sub-Syrt horizon and the upper part of the Syrt sequence, which may be associated with gypsum dissolution processes.

Bicarbonate waters are relatively stable in many horizons, varying within 200–600 mg/L, which is typical of waters from the active water-exchange zone. There are horizons with extremely low mineralization, where all indicators do not exceed several tens of mg/L, which may correspond to zones of active water exchange. Even within a single horizon, a sharp transition from fresh waters to brines is observed, especially in marine and sub-Syrt deposits. At the same time, the aeolian and alluvial-deltaic horizons contain fresher lenses with low salt concentrations. Carbonate ions occur sporadically and in small amounts (up to 138 mg/L), which indicates a predominantly slightly acidic or neutral environment (Bandi et al., 2024; Dorji & Wangchuk, 2024; Pardo-Zamora & Castellano-Rioja, 2024; Cavero & Ferraz, 2025; Hamaideh et al., 2025; Pop & Stan, 2025; Sagredo-Olivares & Bravo, 2025; Tutticci & Marian, 2025). The waters of the horizons are characterized by a wide range of chemical composition, from bicarbonate-calcium (fresh) to chloride-sodium (brackish and saline). High concentrations of chlorides and sulfates in a number of samples indicate a significant degree of mineralization and a possible relationship with marine deposits. The upper marine horizons (Khvalynian, Baku-Khazarian) tend toward sulfate-chloride contamination and elevated mineralization, while some areas retain a bicarbonate-calcium composition with low mineralization. Waters of the alluvial deposit complex (modern and Quaternary) mostly belong to the bicarbonate-calcium type. The hydrochemical pattern is characterized by a transition from fresh bicarbonate waters in alluvial deposits to chloride-sodium brines in deep or marine Quaternary horizons. The presence of high carbonate concentrations (up to 138 mg/L) in individual zones indicates special physicochemical conditions of groundwater composition formation. Unlike deep horizons, the aeolian horizon is generally less mineralized, which is explained by its near-surface occurrence and its relation to atmospheric precipitation; however, it demonstrates considerable variability in composition depending on the specific sampling point. Water from the Middle Quaternary aeolian-deluvial horizon is fresh and fully suitable for all types of farm animals (cattle, horses, and sheep) without any salinity restrictions. Indicators in the Middle–Upper Quaternary alluvial horizon are also in most cases within the normal range for livestock watering. The water is characterized as good and is suitable for permanent use in animal husbandry. The Apsheron aquifer (Lower Quaternary deposits) is extremely heterogeneous. There are sources with chloride contents of only 9.45–11.52 mg/L and sulfate contents of 49.5–766.6 mg/L. Such water is suitable for livestock. Due to the presence of highly saline lenses, the use of water from this horizon for livestock watering requires mandatory chemical analysis of each particular borehole. Water with chlorides above 3,000–4,000 mg/L is not permitted for livestock consumption.

Groundwater in aeolian formations in the Atyrau Region occurs at depths from 0.5–3 m (deflation hollows, interdune depressions, sor and lake depressions, river floodplains) to 15–20 m (elevated watershed plains) (Table 2).

 

 

Table 2. Hydrogeological characteristics of the surveyed underground water sources from aquifers in the Atyrau Region

Aquifers

Well type

Number

Depth, m

Static level, m

Yield, dm³/s

Mineralization, g/dm³

Modern aeolian

dug well

109

2-9

1,5-8

0,08-0,52

0,7-20,6

borehole

2

18-100

10-80

0,3-2,4

4-6,6

Quaternary alluvial deposits

dug well

1

3

2,5

0,2

2,7

borehole

2

6-12

4-9

1,5

4

Upper Quaternary marine Khvalynian, Lower–Middle Quaternary marine Baku-Khazarian

dug well

29

1,5-13

1-12

0,1-0,3

0,6-14,3

borehole

12

6-195

5-162

1,4-2,1

0,6-17,3

Cenomanian-Albian deposits

dug well

7

3-6

2-4,5

0,12-0,2

1-5,5

borehole

2

18

12

1,4

2,5

Upper Cretaceous deposits

dug well

2

5-6

3

0,15-0,18

0,6

 

 

The presence of loose, highly permeable sands promotes the rapid infiltration, especially in non-stabilized areas, of a significant portion of winter-spring atmospheric precipitation and the formation of fresh and slightly brackish groundwater. The least mineralized waters, with total dissolved solids mainly up to 1 and more often 0.5 g/L, are developed in Taisoygan and within the valleys of the Emba and Uil rivers. Here, fresh waters have almost continuous distribution and considerable thickness (3–10 m). In other areas of the sandy massifs, waters with mineralization from 2 to 10 g/L predominate. Fresh waters occur here as lenses floating on the surface of saline and brackish water. Under sors and salt marshes, water mineralization varies from 10 to 50 g/L and more. Fresh waters with mineralization up to 1 g/L are mainly bicarbonate or sulfate-bicarbonate calcium and sodium in chemical composition (Figure 2).

Among waters of elevated mineralization (2–10 g/L), chloride-sulfate and chloride-sodium varieties predominate, often of mixed composition. Chloride sodium waters are developed on interdune-interridge plains. Groundwater in all these formations occurs at depths from 0.5–3 m (deflation hollows, interdune depressions, sor and lake depressions, river floodplains, etc.) to 15–20 m (elevated watershed plains). The mineralization and chemical composition of pore groundwater are extremely diverse. The least mineralized waters (with rare lenses of saline waters), with total dissolved solids up to 1 g/L, are developed in the Naryn massif, Biryuk-Taisoygan, and also in the valley of the Ural River.

Confined waters are widespread in the region. However, slightly mineralized waters (total dissolved solids 1.5–5 g/L) are developed only within the thickness of Upper Albian deposits in the marginal part of the South Emba salt-dome district, east of the Kulsary, Tyulyus–Karachungul belt. They are confined to horizons of fine- and medium-grained quartz-glauconite sands with a total thickness of 25–70 m (on average about 35 m) and occur near salt domes at depths of 250–350 m and between domes at depths of 500–700 m. Groundwater mineralization varies from 2–8.3 g/L in the eastern part of the South Emba district to 15–160 g/L and more in the west of the district and in the central part of the Caspian Depression. The water composition is sodium chloride.

 

 

Figure 2. Hydrochemical characteristics of water from the surveyed boreholes and wells in the Atyrau Region

 

 

Alluvial waters often have a more pronounced bicarbonate component compared with marine horizons, which tend toward the sulfate-chloride type. Deep aquifer complexes (Cretaceous deposits — Cenomanian-Albian and Upper Cretaceous) are usually characterized by a more stable chemical composition. In the diagram, they are grouped in the zone reflecting the gradual metamorphization of composition from bicarbonate to sulfate or chloride with increasing depth. In all horizons, a significant predominance of sodium and potassium over divalent cations (calcium and magnesium) is observed. This is typical of zones with intense evaporative concentration or marine genesis of the deposits. In the Khvalynian and Baku-Khazarian deposits, the highest average sulfate-ion values were recorded (776.5 mg/L). This may indicate the presence of gypsum in the water-bearing rocks. The total ion content in the Upper Cretaceous horizon is less than 1,000 mg/L, which complies with standards for all types of livestock. Most water sources from the Cenomanian-Albian deposits are within the mineralization range of 1,000–3,000 mg/L. Such water is suitable for cattle, sheep, and horses without restriction. Sources in the marine Khvalynian and Baku-Khazarian horizons with sodium contents above 4,000–8,000 mg/L are unsuitable for cattle but may be used to a limited extent for adult sheep (the most salt-tolerant animals) with gradual adaptation.

The most powerful source of pasture watering is fresh and slightly brackish groundwater from the Cenomanian-Albian deposits, widely known in Mangyshlak. These waters are of great importance in the territory located east of the Caspian Karakums, where the Cenomanian-Albian aquifer complex occurs at depths of 300–500 m (Table 3, Figure 3).

 

 

Table 3. Hydrogeological characteristics of the surveyed underground water sources from aquifers in the Mangystau Region

Aquifers

Well type

Number

Depth, m

Static level, m

Yield, dm³/s

Mineralization, g/dm³

Modern aeolian

dug well

16

5,4-11

4,7-10

0,1-0,2

0,7-49,2

borehole

6

20-80

12-64

0,5-1,2

0,9-16,1

Upper Quaternary marine Khvalynian, Lower–Middle Quaternary marine Baku-Khazarian

dug well

2

3-5

2-4

0,3

14,1

borehole

9

15-500

9-70

0,09-1,2

0,6-9

Eocene-Paleocene deposits

borehole

3

90-300

70

1,2

3,2-9,5

Cenomanian-Albian deposits

borehole

4

70-500

50-54

0,8-1,2

0,98-8

Sarmatian deposits

dug well

10

5-20

1,2-12

0,09-0,32

1,28-10,7

borehole

18

18-1200

12,5-120

0,6-1,4

3,8-22,5

Modern lacustrine-sor deposits

borehole

1

1000

120

1,4

16,8

Upper Cretaceous deposits

borehole

4

100-500

70-80

0,9-1,2

5,6-10,1

 

 

Groundwater reserves with mineralization of 1–3 g/L here are preliminarily estimated at more than 5 m/s, of which 1.5–2 m/s of water can be obtained under free artesian flow.

At present, there are more than 100 flowing boreholes in this area, yielding slightly brackish waters with mineralization from 1 to 4–6 g/L and a total discharge of 0.6 m³/s. However, only a small portion of this water is used for livestock watering. On the Mangyshlak Peninsula, waters of the Cenomanian-Albian aquifer complex are used for livestock watering in the areas of mountainous and southern Mangyshlak.

Marine Quaternary deposits are widespread everywhere, but groundwater occurs in them locally in lenses and interbeds of sand. In the central elevated part of the North Mangyshlak, or Buzachi, artesian basin, fresh and slightly brackish waters predominate, while along its margins saline waters and brines occur. The depth of groundwater occurrence, depending on landform morphology, varies from 5 to 10 m and sometimes reaches 15 m.

From a hydrogeological point of view, the Central Mangyshlak district is a local recharge area for many aquifers. Groundwater suitable for pasture watering is developed mainly in Permian-Triassic and Cenomanian-Albian deposits. Within the Permian-Triassic sequence, these waters are confined to the uppermost, most fractured part of the zone, up to 40–50 m thick, and have mineralization of 0.3–0.8 g/L, more rarely higher. Groundwater in polymictic sands and sandstones of the Upper Albian and Cenomanian occurs at depths of 10–70 m and has mineralization of 0.6–2 g/L.

Analysis of the data indicates significant hydrochemical heterogeneity. Deep horizons (Cenomanian-Albian, Cretaceous) have a stable, mature composition, whereas Quaternary and modern horizons strongly depend on evaporative concentration processes and interaction with salt-bearing sediments..

 

 

Figure 3. Hydrochemical characteristics of water from the surveyed boreholes and wells in the Mangystau Region

 

 

The upper part of the platform cover of the South Mangyshlak artesian basin is of the greatest practical importance, where groundwater suitable for pasture watering is contained in Cenomanian-Albian and Sarmatian deposits, as well as in Quaternary aeolian sands. The depth of groundwater occurrence in the aquifers of the Cenomanian-Albian complex within the area is highly variable. Borehole productivity varies from 5 to 48 L/s. Fresh and slightly brackish waters (0.7–8 g/L) in Sarmatian deposits occur in the northern and central parts of the plateau at depths of 15–40 m. The yields of watering points are 0.1–8 L/s, more rarely up to 8 L/s. Fresh waters (0.3–1 g/L) are also developed in sandy aeolian massifs. When penetrated by boreholes, these waters yield 1–8 L/s. Fresh waters (0.3–1 g/L) of shallow occurrence (1–25 m) are also developed in sandy aeolian massifs. When penetrated by boreholes, these waters yield 1–8 L/s.

One of the important sources of pasture watering is groundwater from Sarmatian limestones, which is widespread in Mangyshlak and on the Ustyurt Plateau and is relatively easily accessible because of its shallow occurrence. The thickness of the zone of fresh and brackish waters in different parts of this territory varies from 1–3 to 5–10 m and only rarely reaches 20 m. Waters from the Sarmatian limestones are widely used for livestock watering. These waters are encountered by wells 5–15 to 30–40 m deep and, more rarely, 60 m. Groundwater from the Sarmatian limestones is encountered by wells and boreholes at depths from 5–10 to 50–60 m, with yields from hundredths of a unit to 0.5 L/s.

Within the Quaternary aeolian sands and Neogene limestones, which are widespread within Ustyurt, slightly mineralized groundwater suitable for pasture watering is contained. These waters occur at depths from 5–6 to 20–30 m and more. The thickness of the water-bearing rocks varies from 10 to 25 m, and the mineralization of the waters often exceeds 1–3 g/L. The water abundance of the deposits varies: the yields of watering points range from 0.1–0.3 to 6 L/s. Specific capacities are 0.1–0.5 m/s. Groundwater is encountered in sands at depths from 1 to 12 m. The thickness of the aquifer in the center of the massif reaches 17–20 m, decreasing toward its margins to 1.5–0.5 m. Water mineralization varies within 0.7–12 g/L, and in depressions between barkhans it reaches 50 g/L and more.

CONCLUSION

The organization of pasture watering directly depends on the availability of water resources in the area.

For the effective use of groundwater, it is necessary to describe the hydrogeological conditions and the distribution of groundwater within pasture areas. Various parameters of artesian and groundwater, the conditions of their formation, their regime, and the patterns of occurrence of high-yield aquifers should be studied and mapped in greater depth and detail. For this purpose, research should be directed toward groundwater exploration and testing, as well as detailed hydrogeological surveying of pasture territories, especially in areas where groundwater occurs sporadically and has highly variable mineralization. The republic has vast pasture areas that are not used in the economy, with a total area amounting to tens of millions of hectares. At the same time, the forage from only the pastures currently in use replaces no less than several million hectares of arable land. This clearly demonstrates the importance of pasture-watering measures.

Within the framework of this project, research work is being carried out to develop methods for the effective watering of pastures using groundwater.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: None

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: This research has been funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan Grant No. BR22883585 «Development of effective technologies to increase productive potential and rational use of pastures».

 

ETHICS STATEMENT: None

References

Al-Jassim, R., Al-Khalifa, N., & Fadel, E. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of surgery with complementary radiofrequency ablation in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer, 4(1), 51–60. doi:10.51847/o0zaWPmALB

Aslan, V., & Sepetcioglu, M. Y. (2025). Modeling and evaluation of Mardin groundwater level potential using the TOPSIS method. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 28(3), 553–561. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2025.08.003

Bandi, V., Dey, S. K., & Rao, O. (2024). Factors influencing the physician prescribing behaviour of medicines in developed and developing countries: A systematic review. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care, 5, 21–34. doi:10.51847/ZS3boQgksO

Cavero, M., & Ferraz, J. P. (2025). Sedentary behavior determinants in pregnant women during the second and third trimesters: Prospective findings from the large-scale Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Bulletin of Pioneer Research in Medical and Clinical Sciences, 5(1), 1–12. doi:10.51847/bdDIEuY7cl

Clark, A., & Foster, H. (2025). Network pharmacology integration and experimental verification to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of triptolide in treating membranous nephropathy. Pharmaceutical Science and Drug Design, 5, 33–47. doi:10.51847/X9UVmVSJ4E

Coleman, R., Green, N., Brooks, E., Miller, J., & Foster, L. (2025). Influence of genetic variants on risperidone-associated prolactin elevation in Thai pediatric ASD patients. Special Journal of Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry and Biotechnology, 5, 191–205. doi:10.51847/hkps1ATq37

Costa, D., Santos, J., & Chambel, A. (2025). Five decades of groundwater change across a diverse Mediterranean climate region: Disentangling natural and human drivers of water quantity and quality. Science of the Total Environment, 1006, 180925. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180925

Dar, T., Rai, N., & Bhat, A. (2021). Delineation of potential groundwater recharge zones using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Geology, Ecology and Landscapes, 5, 292–307. doi:10.1080/24749508.2020.1726562

Di Fiore, A., Stellini, E., Savio, G., Rosso, S., Graiff, L., & Granata, S. (2024). A review of recent literature on the handling of anterior resin-bonded cantilever restorations. Journal of Current Research in Oral Surgery, 4, 1–8. doi:10.51847/JcU1FD46Qw

Dorji, T., & Wangchuk, P. (2024). Ethical considerations in health monitoring within the armed forces: A Dutch case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 4, 204–214. doi:10.51847/XV2L2pctU9

Elerian, A. E., Rodriguez-Sanz, D., Elsherif, A. A., Dorgham, H. A., Al-Hamaky, D. M. A., Fakharany, M. S. E., & Ewidea, M. (2024). A analysis of high-intensity laser therapy vs. shock wave therapy in diabetic frozen shoulder management. Journal of Medical Sciences Interdisciplinary Research, 4(2), 41–46. doi:10.51847/HA5MUZmTk4

Frappart, F., & Merwade, V. M. (2022). Editorial: Groundwater systems worldwide. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 1097789. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.1097789

Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G., & Perrone, D. (2020). Global groundwater sustainability, resources, and systems in the anthropocene. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48, 431–463. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055251

Guillen, J., & Pereira, R. (2024). Institutional influence on gender entrepreneurship in Latin America. Annual Organizational Culture, Leadership, and External Engagement Journal, 5, 28–38. doi:10.51847/RaQltcyzXu

Haddad, Y. A., Khalil, R. M., & Nassar, S. T. (2024). Assessing a bespoke training and competency framework for pharmacist independent prescribers in UK care home medicines management. Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, Public Health and Advocacy, 4, 172–180. doi:10.51847/qqkfccldze

Hamaideh, S., Khait, A. A., Al-Modallal, H., Masa’deh, R., Hamdan-Mansour, A., & AlBashtawy, M. (2025). Investigating the role of different factors in the quality of professional life of nurses: A review study. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care, 6, 12–17. doi:10.51847/k8xYY6EKKp

Heinke, J., Lannerstad, M., Gerten, D., Havlík, P., Herrero, M., Notenbaert, A. M. O., Hoff, H., & Müller, C. (2020). Water use in global livestock production – opportunities and constraints for increasing water productivity. Water Resources Research, 56(12). doi:10.1029/2019WR026995

Huang, M. L. (2025). Enhancing agitation management skills and empathy in healthcare students through virtual reality–based experiential learning. Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, Public Health and Advocacy, 5, 60–74. doi:10.51847/xaNb8pCkQ4

Karimi, M., Tabiee, M., Karami, S., Karimi, V., & Karamidehkordi, E. (2024). Climate change and water scarcity impacts on sustainability in semi-arid areas: Lessons from the South of Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 24, 101075. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2023.101075

King, S., Hall, O., & White, D. (2025). A cross-sectional survey on the challenges and opportunities of Italian-qualified pharmacists transferred to work in Great Britain. Annals of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapy, 5, 23–42. doi:10.51847/8aAEcR1YFw

Kyaw, A., Lin, H., & Thura, M. (2024). High-throughput pharmacogene haplotyping with Oxford Nanopore adaptive sampling in 1,036 clinically relevant genes. Special Journal of Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry and Biotechnology, 4, 171–182. doi:10.51847/xutu52cul2

Murphy, L., Kelly, A., & O'Brien, S. (2024). Biologic injections with prolonged action: Transforming immune system therapies. Annals of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapy, 4, 73–81. doi:10.51847/PdFIQ5uOUj

Nasiyev, B. N., Zhanatalapov, N. Z., & Shibaikin, B. (2021). Assessment of the elements of the Sudan grass cultivation technology in the zone of dry steppes. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 21(1), 172–180. doi:10.3844/ojbsci.2021.172.180

Nasiyev, B., Karynbayev, A., Khiyasov, M., Bekkaliyev, A., Zhanatalapov, N., Begeyeva, M., Bekkaliyeva, A., & Shibaikin, V. (2023). Influence of cattle grazing methods on changes in vegetation cover and productivity of pasture lands in the semi-desert zone of Western Kazakhstan. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 18(4), 767–774. doi:10.18280/ijdne.180402

Ongayev, M., Denizbayev, S., Ozhanov, G., & Shadyarov, T. (2021). Underground water supply to pastures. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 6(3), 98–103.

Ongayev, M., Denizbayev, S., Ozhanov, G., Yesmagulova, B., Umbetkaliyev, N., & Shadyarov, T. (2023). Analysis of hydrochemical parameters of surface water sources used for watering pastures to improve the water quality. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(4), 875–883. doi:10.22124/CJES.2023.7145

Ongayev, M., Denizbayev, S., Umbetkaliyev, N., Shadyarov, T., & Ozhanov, G. (2022). The zonality of underground water supply sources for pastures in the West Kazakhstan region. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(8), 56–65. doi:10.12911/22998993/150612

Ongayev, M., Montayev, S., Denizbayev, S., & Sakhipova, S. (2024). Hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater in Northwestern Kazakhstan aquifers: Implications for livestock water supply. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 19(4), 1327–1340. doi:10.18280/ijdne.190425

Pardo-Zamora, F., & Castellano-Rioja, G. (2024). Liquid biopsy in oral cancer diagnosis: A narrative review of emerging diagnostic tools. Archive International Journal of Cancer and Allied Sciences, 4(1), 1–6. doi:10.51847/CcaLqtzvoN

Park, K. (2024). Advances in controlled drug release systems: Current trends and future prospects. Pharmaceutical Science and Drug Design, 4, 26–34. doi:10.51847/m708A2Qw3b

Petrova, E., Kozlov, I. S., & Smirnova, M. V. (2024). Health-related quality of life experiences of patients managed with prolonged indwelling urinary catheters in a tertiary urology outpatient setting in Northwestern Tanzania. International Journal of Social Psychology Aspects in Healthcare, 4, 68–76. doi:10.51847/ECzuK04JAj

Pop, A. I., & Stan, R. D. (2025). EFNB2/EPHB4 axis activation promotes post-metastatic colonization of colorectal cancer in the liver through LDLR-mediated cholesterol metabolism. Archive International Journal of Cancer and Allied Sciences, 5(1), 179–199. doi:10.51847/Z45KOBSjYh

Rafiei, F., Gharechelou, S., Golian, S., & Johnson, B. A. (2022). Aquifer and land subsidence interaction assessment using Sentinel-1 data and DInSAR technique. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11, 495. doi:10.3390/ijgi11090495

Rivas, M. S., & Munoz, C. B. (2025). Evaluation of the hepato-renal protective activity of ethanolic Mucuna pruriens leaf extract in drug- and chemical-induced toxicity in Wistar rats. Journal of Medical Sciences Interdisciplinary Research, 5(2), 117–132. doi:10.51847/MvcyoqX1Kh

Rochford, L. M., Bulovic, N., Ordens, C. M., & McIntyre, N. (2023). What makes them pump? Factors influencing groundwater extraction for cattle grazing in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 279, 108158. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108158

Sagredo-Olivares, K., & Bravo, P. R. (2025). FKBP5 gene polymorphisms and insomnia symptoms during depressive episodes in stress-related bipolar disorder. Bulletin of Pioneer Research in Medical and Clinical Sciences, 5(1), 137–151. doi:10.51847/jKltbXlwMc

Sarami-Foroushani, T., Balali, H., Movahedi, R., & Partelow, S. (2024). Indicator assessment of groundwater resource sustainability: Using the framework of socio-ecological systems in Hamedan–Bahar Plain, Iran. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 54, 101889. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101889

Sepahvand, F., Naderi Mahdei, K., Gholamrezai, S., & Bijani, M. (2025). Groundwater sustainability challenges in Iran's Kuhdasht Plain: A socio-ecological perspective using Ostrom's framework. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 10, 100316. doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100316

Tan, G. Y., Lim, W. M., Ong, H. X., Ismail, F. N., & Coleman, R. S. (2025). Aligning organizational culture with innovation outcomes: Development and validation of an innovative culture enhancement framework. Annual Organizational Culture, Leadership, and External Engagement Journal, 6, 195–205. doi:10.51847/oxRmXoFHZS

Thamaga, K. H., Gom, S., Adesola, G. O., Ndou, N., Muavhi, N., Mndela, M., Sibandze, P., Abdo, H. G., Maphanga, T., Afuye, G. A., et al. (2024). Integration of geospatial-based algorithms for groundwater potential characterization in Keiskamma Catchment of South Africa. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 26, 101262. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101262

Todayama, N., Hara, R., Tabata, T., Hatanaka, Y., Mukai, T., Someya, M., Kuwazawa, M., Suzuki, H., Hironaka, S., Kawate, N., et al. (2024). A collaborative approach to managing complex dental conditions. Journal of Current Research in Oral Surgery, 4, 50–55. doi:10.51847/w6WKRmv4qY

Toktogonov, D., Isayeva, A., & Kadyrov, R. (2025). PLK1 inhibitors exhibit potent preclinical activity in platinum-sensitive and resistant small cell lung cancer models. Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer, 5(1), 68–80. doi:10.51847/vbnoiDzIdm

Tutticci, S., & Marian, M. (2025). Integrating environmental sustainability into clinical decision-making: A systematic review of rationale. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 5, 79–94. doi:10.51847/oGhDOKCuki

Welie, M. V. M., & Liesbeth, M. (2025). Financial struggles and contributing factors among individuals with psychotic disorders: Three perspectives. International Journal of Social Psychology Aspects in Healthcare, 5, 59–73. doi:10.51847/819Cxl3Pur

Wu, W. Y., Min-Hui, L., Yoshihide, W., James, S. F., John, R., Pat, Y., Agnès, D., & Zong-Liang, Y. (2020). Divergent effects of climate change on future groundwater availability in key mid-latitude aquifers. Nature Communications, 3710. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17581-y

Yadav, B., Malav, L. C., Jangir, A., Kharia, S. K., Singh, S. V., Yeasin, M., & Yadav, K. K. (2023). Application of analytical hierarchical process, multi-influencing factor, and geospatial techniques for groundwater potential zonation in a semi-arid region of western India. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 253, 104122. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104122

Zakaev, T. T., Bakrieva, M. V., Alkhazova, R. T., Girkina, D. B., Chagarova, A. Y., & Polyanskaya, A. A. (2024). Ensuring cardiovascular safety in the management of chronic rheumatic diseases. Interdisciplinary Research in Medical Sciences Special, 4(1), 33–36. doi:10.51847/hbkRZI8YMn

Zar, H. J., Moore, D. P., Andronikou, S., Argent, A. C., Avenant, T., Cohen, C., Green, R. J., Itzikowitz, G., Jeena, P., Masekela, R., et al. (2024). Principles of diagnosis and treatment in children with acute pneumonia. Interdisciplinary Research in Medical Sciences Special, 4(2), 24–32. doi:10.51847/4RVz1Zxy4h

Zeydalinejad, N., Mahdavikia, H., Goudarzi, A., & Saeidi, S. (2023). The present challenges and policy for sustainable management of groundwater resources in Iran: Putting emphasis on Lorestan province as an example in the country. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 9(3), 95. doi:10.1007/s40899-023-00883-6

Zwarteveen, M., Kuper, M., Olmos-Herrera, C., Dajani, M., Kemerink-Seyoum, J., Frances, C., Beckett, L., Lu, F., Kulkarni, S., Kulkarni, H., et al. (2021). Transformations to groundwater sustainability: From individuals and pumps to communities and aquifers. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 88–97. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.004

 

 

 

 

 


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Ongayev M, Nasiyev B, Tumlert V, Denizbayev S, Shadyarov T, Ozhanov G, et al. Hydrogeological and Hydrochemical Characteristics of Groundwater in Western Kazakhstan Used for Pasture Watering. World J Environ Biosci. 2025;14(4):82-91. https://doi.org/10.51847/DuQej6O1zh
APA
Ongayev, M., Nasiyev, B., Tumlert, V., Denizbayev, S., Shadyarov, T., Ozhanov, G., Umbetkaliyev, N., Ustabaev, T., Telgarayeva, G., & Alimbetova, G. (2025). Hydrogeological and Hydrochemical Characteristics of Groundwater in Western Kazakhstan Used for Pasture Watering. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences, 14(4), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.51847/DuQej6O1zh
Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Environmental Biosciences. Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.