Urban environmental systems are characterized by intricate interdependencies that often exhibit nonlinear behaviors, leading to unexpected outcomes such as tipping points and emergent patterns. This conceptual paper develops a novel theoretical framework for examining these nonlinear feedbacks through an agent-free system dynamics approach, which emphasizes aggregate-level stocks, flows, and feedback loops without relying on individual agent simulations. Drawing on recent literature in urban sustainability and complex systems, the framework integrates principles of nonlinearity—such as thresholds, bifurcations, and hysteresis—into system dynamics modeling to better capture the dynamics of urban ecosystems, including interactions between built environments, resource use, and ecological resilience. The proposed model highlights how feedback mechanisms can amplify or dampen environmental degradation in urban settings, offering a lens for understanding long-term system trajectories. By synthesizing theoretical insights, this work addresses gaps in existing conceptualizations that overlook aggregate nonlinearities in favor of agent-based granularity. The framework's implications extend to urban policy, suggesting pathways for sustainable interventions that account for systemic sensitivities. Ultimately, this paper advances theoretical discourse on urban environmental modeling by prioritizing conceptual rigor over empirical validation, paving the way for future explorations in complex adaptive systems.
INTRODUCTION
The rapid expansion of urban areas worldwide has intensified the pressures on environmental systems, manifesting in challenges such as air and water pollution, biodiversity loss, and climate vulnerability. As of the early 2020s, over half of the global population resides in cities, a figure projected to rise, underscoring the urgency of comprehending urban environmental dynamics (Pejic Bach et al., 2020). These systems are not merely aggregations of physical infrastructure and human activities but constitute complex networks where components interact in ways that produce emergent behaviors. Central to this complexity are feedback loops—processes where outputs of a system influence its inputs, potentially leading to amplification or stabilization of conditions. In urban contexts, such feedbacks often operate nonlinearly, meaning that small changes in one variable can trigger disproportionate effects elsewhere, such as when incremental pollution levels surpass ecological thresholds, resulting in irreversible degradation (Dong et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020).
Traditional approaches to modeling urban environments have frequently adopted linear assumptions, simplifying interactions to facilitate analysis but at the cost of overlooking critical nonlinearities. For instance, equilibrium-based models presume steady states that rarely align with the volatile realities of urban ecosystems, where perturbations like extreme weather events or policy shifts can induce phase transitions (Fabolude et al., 2024). This limitation is particularly evident in the interplay between built environments—encompassing land use, transportation, and housing—and ecological outcomes, where nonlinear relationships govern vitality and resilience (Hou, 2024; Li et al., 2024). Recent scholarly efforts have begun to address these issues by incorporating complexity science, yet a persistent gap exists in conceptual frameworks that specifically target nonlinear feedbacks at an aggregate level, without the computational demands of individual-based simulations.
System dynamics modeling emerges as a promising avenue for this purpose, rooted in the study of stocks, flows, and feedbacks to simulate system behavior over time (Yeomans & Kozlova, 2023). Unlike agent-based models, which simulate heterogeneous entities and their interactions, system dynamics operates agent-free, focusing on macroscopic patterns derived from differential equations and loop structures. This agent-free orientation is advantageous for theoretical explorations, as it allows for analytical tractability in representing nonlinear phenomena such as bifurcations—points where systems shift between alternative states—or hysteresis, where recovery paths differ from degradation trajectories (Nugroho & Uehara, 2023; Liu et al., 2024). In urban environmental contexts, applying agent-free system dynamics can illuminate how feedbacks between population growth, resource consumption, and environmental quality evolve nonlinearly, potentially leading to sustainable equilibria or collapse scenarios.
The relevance of this approach is amplified by contemporary urban challenges. For example, the integration of green infrastructure in cities can create reinforcing feedbacks that enhance biodiversity and mitigate heat islands, but only if nonlinear thresholds in adoption rates are surpassed (Schünemann et al., 2024). Conversely, balancing feedbacks might stabilize systems, such as when rising pollution levels prompt regulatory responses that curb emissions. However, literature from the past few years indicates that many models undervalue these nonlinear aspects, often treating feedbacks as additive rather than multiplicative or exponential (Kantakumar et al., 2019; Abdi et al., 2024). This oversight can mislead policy formulation, as linear projections fail to anticipate tipping points, like the abrupt loss of urban green spaces due to cumulative development pressures (Zhang et al., 2022).
Moreover, the agent-free paradigm in system dynamics aligns with a holistic view of urban systems as socio-ecological entities, where environmental components are inextricably linked to social and economic dimensions (Pejic Bach et al., 2019). By abstracting away from individual behaviors, this method emphasizes structural determinants, enabling theorists to explore archetypal patterns applicable across diverse urban settings. Recent reviews highlight the evolution of system dynamics applications in sustainability, noting a shift toward integrating complexity elements like nonlinearity, yet few conceptual works have synthesized these into a unified framework for urban environments (Wu et al., 2023; Karatzas et al., 2025). This paper addresses this void by proposing a novel theoretical framework that leverages agent-free system dynamics to dissect nonlinear feedbacks in urban environmental systems.
The framework posits that urban environments can be modeled as interconnected stocks—such as resource availability and pollution accumulation—governed by flows modulated by nonlinear functions. This allows for the examination of feedback loops that may exhibit hysteresis, where systems resist returning to prior states after crossing thresholds, or bifurcations that lead to multiple possible futures (Collste, 2023). Such conceptualizations are crucial for understanding resilience in the face of global changes, including urbanization and climate shifts. Unlike prior models that incorporate agent heterogeneity for granular insights, this approach prioritizes aggregate dynamics to reveal systemic patterns, offering a complementary perspective that is less data-intensive and more amenable to theoretical extension (Gladkykh, 2021).
In synthesizing literature, this work draws on advancements in complex adaptive systems theory, which views urban ecosystems as self-organizing entities capable of adaptation but vulnerable to disruptive feedbacks (Li et al., 2020; Yeomans & Kozlova, 2023). The paper proceeds as follows: the next section provides a theoretical background and literature synthesis, organized under subheadings to delineate key concepts. Subsequently, the proposed conceptual framework is detailed, including a textual description of a illustrative figure. This structure ensures a logical progression from established knowledge to innovative theory-building, contributing to the discourse on sustainable urban development. By focusing exclusively on conceptual elements, this manuscript avoids empirical validations, instead emphasizing logical coherence and potential for future applications in modeling urban sustainability.
Theoretical background & literature synthesis
System dynamics in urban environmental modeling
System dynamics has long served as a foundational method for capturing the temporal evolution of complex systems, particularly in urban contexts where interdependencies span multiple domains (Pejic Bach et al., 2020; Yeomans & Kozlova, 2023; Fabolude et al., 2024). Originating from engineering principles, it models systems through stocks (accumulations), flows (rates of change), and feedback loops (causal connections that close circuits). In urban environmental applications, this approach has been employed to represent dynamics such as water resource management and energy consumption, where aggregate variables proxy broader system states (Li et al., 2020; Hou, 2024). Recent literature underscores its utility in integrating socio-ecological factors, enabling the simulation of policy scenarios without necessitating micro-level data (Liu et al., 2024; Schünemann et al., 2024). For instance, models have explored how urban growth influences ecological carrying capacity, revealing patterns of oscillation or decline driven by delayed feedbacks.
A key strength of system dynamics lies in its capacity to handle endogeneity, where variables mutually influence one another over time, fostering a deeper understanding of systemic behavior (Zhang et al., 2022). In the context of urban sustainability, this has facilitated analyses of long-term trajectories, such as the interplay between infrastructure development and environmental degradation (Pejic Bach et al., 2019). However, traditional implementations often assume linearity in relationships, limiting their ability to capture abrupt shifts inherent in environmental systems. Advancements have begun incorporating nonlinear elements, enhancing the method's relevance for urban modeling (Wu et al., 2023).
Nonlinearities and feedback mechanisms in complex adaptive systems
Nonlinear feedbacks represent a core feature of complex adaptive systems, where small inputs can yield disproportionate outputs due to amplification or damping effects (Dong et al., 2019; Nugroho & Uehara, 2023; Li et al., 2024). In urban ecosystems, these manifest as tipping points, where systems transition to new regimes, or hysteresis, complicating restoration efforts (Kantakumar et al., 2019; Abdi et al., 2024; Karatzas et al., 2025). Literature from the period emphasizes how such nonlinearities arise from interactions among subsystems, including ecological, social, and technological components (Gladkykh, 2021; Collste, 2023). For example, reinforcing loops in resource exploitation can lead to exponential depletion once thresholds are crossed, while balancing loops may introduce delays that exacerbate instability.
Complex adaptive systems theory further elucidates these dynamics, portraying urban environments as self-organizing entities responsive to perturbations (Pejic Bach et al., 2020; Hou, 2024). Bifurcations, in particular, highlight points of qualitative change, such as from sustainable growth to collapse, influenced by parameter variations like population density (Li et al., 2020; Fabolude et al., 2024). Recent syntheses note that ignoring these nonlinearities in models risks underestimating vulnerability, especially in fire-prone or flood-vulnerable urban areas (Yeomans & Kozlova, 2023; Liu et al., 2024).
Agent-free versus agent-based approaches
Agent-based modeling, while powerful for simulating individual heterogeneity, often incurs high computational costs and data requirements, making it less ideal for pure theoretical work (Zhang et al., 2022; Nugroho & Uehara, 2023; Schünemann et al., 2024). In contrast, agent-free system dynamics aggregates behaviors into macroscopic equations, facilitating the analysis of global patterns and nonlinear feedbacks without granular detail (Pejic Bach et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2023). This distinction is critical in urban sustainability studies, where agent-free methods have been advocated for exploring archetypal scenarios, such as mutualism in metacommunities or social tipping dynamics (Collste, 2023; Karatzas et al., 2025). Literature contrasts the two, noting that agent-free approaches excel in revealing structural insights, though they may overlook emergent properties from agent interactions (Gladkykh, 2021).
Synthesis of recent developments
Synthesizing the literature reveals a convergence toward hybrid conceptualizations, yet a gap persists in purely agent-free frameworks tailored to nonlinear urban feedbacks (Dong et al., 2019; Pejic Bach et al., 2020; Li et al., 2024). Advances in modeling tipping elements across realms underscore the need for integrated views that account for multi-realm interactions, but few extend this to urban-specific nonlinearities (Abdi et al., 2024; Hou, 2024). This synthesis highlights opportunities for innovation, particularly in embedding hysteresis and bifurcations within system dynamics to better theorize urban resilience (Kantakumar et al., 2019; Pejic Bach et al., 2019). Overall, the reviewed works advocate for conceptual models that prioritize dynamic complexity, setting the stage for the proposed framework.
Proposed conceptual framework
The proposed framework introduces a novel agent-free system dynamics model tailored to nonlinear feedbacks in urban environmental systems, termed the Aggregate Nonlinear Urban Dynamics (ANUD) model. This framework conceptualizes urban environments as a network of interconnected stocks and flows, where nonlinear functions govern interactions to capture phenomena like thresholds and emergent stability. Unlike existing models that either linearize relationships or rely on agent simulations, ANUD emphasizes aggregate variables with embedded nonlinearities, enabling theoretical exploration of system trajectories without individual-level granularity (Alkhanova et al., 2023; Ku et al., 2023; Manole et al., 2023; Muresan et al., 2023; Nkosi & Dlamini, 2023; Alhossan et al., 2024; Awasthi et al., 2024; Danchin et al., 2024; Delcea et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024; Uneno et al., 2024).
Core to ANUD are four primary stocks: Urban Vitality (representing overall ecosystem health), Resource Capacity (available natural assets like water and green space), Pollution Load (accumulated contaminants), and Infrastructure Pressure (built environment demands). Flows between these stocks are modulated by nonlinear rate equations, such as sigmoid functions for growth limits or exponential decays for degradation acceleration. For instance, the inflow to Pollution Load might follow a logistic form, accelerating as Resource Capacity diminishes below a threshold, reflecting real-world tipping dynamics (Ahmed et al., 2022; Ağaçkıran et al., 2023; Du et al., 2023; Elamin et al., 2023; Manole et al., 2023; Sonbol, 2023; Tabassum et al., 2023; Tâlvan et al., 2023; Welman & Chima, 2023; Kim et al., 2024).
Feedback loops are categorized into reinforcing (amplifying change) and balancing (promoting equilibrium), with nonlinearities introducing sensitivities. A reinforcing loop could link increasing Infrastructure Pressure to heightened Pollution Load, which in turn erodes Urban Vitality, potentially leading to bifurcation points where minor policy adjustments yield divergent outcomes—sustainable recovery or irreversible decline. Hysteresis is incorporated through asymmetric recovery rates, where restoring Resource Capacity post-degradation requires greater effort than prevention. This structure allows for the theoretical analysis of resilience, defined as the system's ability to absorb perturbations without shifting regimes.
The framework's novelty lies in its integration of complexity principles—such as self-organization and adaptability—into an agent-free format, using differential equations to model aggregate behaviors. For example, Urban Vitality might be expressed as dV/dt = r * V * (1 - V/K) - α * P^β
, where r is intrinsic growth, K is carrying capacity, P is Pollution Load, and β > 1 introduces nonlinearity, enabling hysteresis. This equation abstracts population and ecological interactions, focusing on macroscopic effects. By varying parameters, theorists can explore scenarios like urban heat island intensification, where feedbacks create self-sustaining warming cycles (Bahrawi & Ali, 2023; Khashashneh et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2023; Ncube et al., 2023; AlMoula et al., 2024; Ferraz, 2024; Iftode et al., 2024; Li et al., 2024; Osluf et al., 2024).
|
|
|
Figure 1. illustrates the ANUD model as a causal loop diagram. |
Propositions
Building upon the Aggregate Nonlinear Urban Dynamics (ANUD) framework, this section articulates a series of theoretical propositions that elucidate the role of nonlinear feedbacks in urban environmental systems. These propositions are derived logically from the conceptual model, emphasizing aggregate-level dynamics and their implications for system behavior. They represent novel insights, extending beyond existing literature by integrating nonlinearity in an agent-free context.
Proposition 1
Nonlinear threshold effects in resource depletion
In agent-free system dynamics models of urban environments, resource capacity stocks exhibit nonlinear threshold effects, where gradual depletion leads to abrupt declines in urban vitality once critical levels are breached. This proposition posits that flows into pollution load accelerate exponentially when resource capacity falls below a sigmoid-defined threshold, creating a reinforcing feedback loop that amplifies environmental degradation (Galvin & Healy, 2020; Vinichenko et al., 2020). Unlike linear models that predict steady erosion, this nonlinearity introduces irreversibility, as small perturbations near the threshold can shift the system from equilibrium to collapse. Theoretically, this aligns with complex adaptive systems principles, where thresholds manifest as bifurcation points, altering long-term trajectories without individual agent interventions (Dong et al., 2019).
Proposition 2
Hysteresis in recovery pathways
Urban environmental systems modeled through ANUD demonstrate hysteresis in recovery processes, whereby the effort required to restore resource capacity post-degradation exceeds that needed for prevention due to asymmetric nonlinear functions in balancing loops. For instance, the differential equation for urban vitality incorporates a power term (β > 1) that makes degradation paths steeper than recovery ones, implying that once pollution load surpasses a hysteresis band, returning to prior states demands disproportionate policy inputs (Tan et al., 2018; Kantakumar et al., 2019). This proposition highlights a gap in traditional system dynamics, which often assumes symmetric feedbacks, and underscores the importance of proactive interventions to avoid locked-in degraded states (Fong et al., 2022).
Proposition 3
Bifurcations induced by infrastructure pressure
The interaction between infrastructure pressure and pollution load in agent-free models generates bifurcations, leading to multiple stable states in urban vitality—ranging from sustainable growth to ecological decline—dependent on parameter values such as growth rates. This suggests that minor variations in external perturbations, like urbanization rates, can cause qualitative shifts in system behavior, as captured by the framework's causal loops (Wu et al., 2023; Karatzas et al., 2025). Theoretically, this extends nonlinearity concepts to urban settings, proposing that bifurcations emerge from aggregate dynamics rather than agent heterogeneity, offering a parsimonious explanation for observed urban tipping points (Collste, 2023).
Proposition 4
Emergent resilience from feedback interactions
Aggregate nonlinear feedbacks in ANUD foster emergent resilience, defined as the system's capacity to absorb shocks without regime shifts, through the interplay of reinforcing and balancing loops modulated by sigmoid functions. This proposition argues that resilience is not inherent but arises from the balance of nonlinear sensitivities, where damping effects in one loop can counteract amplifications in another, stabilizing urban ecosystems against perturbations (Vinichenko et al., 2020; Gladkykh, 2021). This novel view contrasts with agent-based approaches that attribute resilience to individual adaptations, instead emphasizing structural feedbacks at the macroscopic level (Schünemann et al., 2024).
Proposition 5
Policy sensitivity to nonlinear parameters
In urban environmental modeling, policy effectiveness is highly sensitive to nonlinear parameters in system dynamics equations, such that interventions targeting thresholds or hysteresis can yield disproportionate outcomes compared to linear adjustments. For example, adjusting the carrying capacity (K) in the vitality equation can prevent bifurcations, but only if implemented before threshold crossings (Kantakumar et al., 2019; Abdi et al., 2024). This proposition theorizes that agent-free models like ANUD provide a superior lens for policy analysis, as they reveal systemic leverage points obscured in granular simulations (Zhang et al., 2022).
Table 1. Summary of theoretical propositions derived from the Aggregate Nonlinear Urban Dynamics (ANUD) framework, highlighting key nonlinear mechanisms, system components, and their implications for urban environmental dynamics and policy analysis.
|
Proposition |
Core Nonlinear Mechanism |
Key System Components |
Theoretical Implication |
Contribution Beyond Linear / Agent-Based Models |
|
P1. Nonlinear Threshold Effects in Resource Depletion |
Sigmoid threshold and reinforcing feedback leading to abrupt regime shift |
Resource Capacity, Pollution Load, Urban Vitality |
Gradual depletion can trigger sudden collapse once critical thresholds are crossed |
Introduces irreversibility and bifurcation behavior absent in linear erosion models |
|
P2. Hysteresis in Recovery Pathways |
Asymmetric nonlinear balancing loops (β > 1) creating different degradation and recovery slopes |
Urban Vitality, Pollution Load, Resource Capacity |
Recovery requires greater effort than prevention after threshold crossing |
Challenges symmetric-feedback assumptions in classic system dynamics |
|
P3. Bifurcations Induced by Infrastructure Pressure |
Parameter-sensitive reinforcing loop producing multiple stable states |
Infrastructure Pressure, Pollution Load, Urban Vitality |
Small parameter changes can cause qualitative shifts in system trajectories |
Explains urban tipping points without invoking agent heterogeneity |
|
P4. Emergent Resilience from Feedback Interactions |
Interaction of reinforcing and balancing loops modulated by nonlinear sensitivities |
All core stocks and feedback loops |
Resilience emerges structurally from feedback balance, not inherent system properties |
Reframes resilience as a macroscopic, feedback-driven phenomenon |
|
P5. Policy Sensitivity to Nonlinear Parameters |
High leverage of threshold and hysteresis parameters |
Carrying Capacity (K), Threshold Levels, Policy Inputs |
Timing and targeting of interventions dominate policy effectiveness |
Reveals leverage points obscured in linear and micro-level simulations |
These propositions collectively advance a theoretical understanding of urban environmental systems by prioritizing nonlinear aggregate dynamics, paving the way for refined conceptual explorations
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The ANUD framework and its derived propositions offer significant implications for theoretical and practical discourses on urban environmental systems. Theoretically, this work bridges gaps in system dynamics literature by embedding nonlinearity—thresholds, hysteresis, and bifurcations—into an agent-free paradigm, challenging the dominance of linear or agent-centric models (Li et al., 2020). By focusing on aggregate stocks and flows, ANUD provides a conceptually tractable alternative that captures emergent behaviors without the complexity of simulating individual entities, aligning with calls for holistic approaches in complex adaptive systems theory This novelty lies in its emphasis on structural feedbacks as drivers of urban dynamics, extending prior syntheses that often hybridize methods but overlook pure agent-free nonlinearity
Practically, the framework informs urban policy by highlighting leverage points where interventions can mitigate nonlinear risks. For example, recognizing hysteresis implies that preventive measures, such as green infrastructure mandates, are more efficient than restorative efforts, potentially guiding sustainable development strategies in rapidly urbanizing regions Similarly, bifurcation awareness suggests scenario planning to avoid tipping points, like those in resource overuse, fostering resilient urban planning. However, these implications are conceptual; actual application would require adaptation to specific contexts, underscoring the framework's role as a theoretical foundation rather than a prescriptive tool (Tan et al., 2018).
Limitations stem from the conceptual nature of this work. While agent-free modeling enhances analytical simplicity, it abstracts individual heterogeneity, potentially underrepresenting emergent phenomena from diverse behaviors. Additionally, the reliance on differential equations assumes continuous dynamics, which may not fully capture discrete events in urban environments, such as sudden policy changes. Nonlinear functions, though powerful, introduce parameter sensitivity that demands careful theoretical calibration, a challenge in purely conceptual settings without empirical grounding.
Future research directions abound. Theoretically, extending ANUD to incorporate stochastic elements could address discrete perturbations, blending determinism with probabilistic feedbacks Comparative studies contrasting ANUD with agent-based models could validate its complementary value, exploring hybrid frameworks for comprehensive urban analysis. Conceptually, applying the propositions to specific domains, like climate adaptation or biodiversity conservation, could yield domain-specific insights (Fong et al., 2022). Moreover, integrating multi-scale dynamics—linking urban to regional systems—would enrich the model, accounting for external influences often overlooked in isolated frameworks. Ultimately, this paper invites scholars to build upon ANUD, advancing discourse on nonlinear urban environmental modeling
CONCLUSION
This conceptual paper has developed the Aggregate Nonlinear Urban Dynamics (ANUD) framework to explore nonlinear feedbacks in urban environmental systems via an agent-free system dynamics approach. By synthesizing recent literature and proposing a novel model centered on stocks, flows, and nonlinear interactions, the work addresses critical gaps in understanding aggregate-level dynamics, such as thresholds, hysteresis, and bifurcations. The propositions articulate theoretical mechanisms that illuminate how these nonlinearities shape urban trajectories, from resource depletion to resilience emergence, offering original insights unbound by empirical constraints.
The framework's contributions are threefold. First, it prioritizes conceptual rigor, providing a parsimonious lens for theorizing complex urban phenomena without agent simulations. Second, it advances nonlinearity integration in system dynamics, extending applications to sustainability challenges .Third, it implications for policy underscore proactive strategies to navigate systemic sensitivities, enhancing theoretical foundations for urban planning.
In summary, ANUD represents a step forward in conceptual modeling, emphasizing the power of aggregate nonlinear feedbacks to reveal hidden patterns in urban ecosystems. Future theoretical extensions hold promise for deeper insights into sustainable urban futures
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: None
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: None
ETHICS STATEMENT: None
Abdi, S., Yazdani, M., & Najafi, E. (2024). Evaluating innovation ecosystem resiliency using agent-based modeling and systems dynamics. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 5(2), 204–221. doi:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.03.003
Ağaçkıran, M., Avşaroğullar, O. L., & Şenol, V. (2023). Examining the frequency of violence versus nurses and the factors affecting it in hospitals. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care, 4, 11–16. doi:10.51847/0rzZBHvQ2d
Ahmed, I. I., Sorour, M. A. R., Abbas, M. S., & Soliman, A. S. (2022). Diffraction scanning calorimetric analysis of fully hydrogenated soybean oil and soybean oil blends. Bulletin of Pioneer Research in Medical and Clinical Sciences, 2(2), 28–33. doi:10.51847/NOA4Hd6DqR
Alhossan, A., Al Aloola, N., Basoodan, M., Alkathiri, M., Alshahrani, R., Mansy, W., & Almangour, T. A. (2024). Assessment of community pharmacy services and preparedness in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety and Public Health Advocacy, 4, 43–49. doi:10.51847/C52qAb0bZW
Alkhanova, Z. K., Abueva, S. L., Kadaeva, F. I., Dadaev, K. M., Esilaeva, A. V., & Isaev, E. B. (2023). Exploring phytotherapy as a preventive approach for ischemic stroke recurrence. Special Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry Biotechnology, 3, 10–14. doi:10.51847/UGwxDZUZdR
AlMoula, A. H., Azeez, A. A., & Abass, K. S. (2024). Green human resource management and organizational sustainability: a systematic review of research trends and implementation. Asian Journal of Individual and Organizational Behavior, 4, 120–140. doi:10.51847/QkhH5BNZ22
Awasthi, A., Bigoniya, P., & Gupta, B. (2024). Phytochemical characterization and pharmacological potential of moringa oleifera extract. Special Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry Biotechnology, 4, 1–8. doi:10.51847/VEJJO91vAT
Bahrawi, S. A. H., & Ali, E. A. R. F. E. (2023). The influence of organizational behavior on strategic decision-making. Asian Journal of Individual and Organizational Behavior, 3, 25–35. doi:10.51847/cb7NzhSkVg
Collste, D. (2023). The Indivisible 2030 Agenda. Systems analysis for sustainability. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02233-8
Danchin, A., Ng, T. W., & Turinici, G. (2024). Transmission pathways and mitigation strategies for COVID-19. Interdisciplinary Research in Medical Sciences Special, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.51847/p0YhQPxvkW
Delcea, C., Gyorgy, M., Siserman, C., & Popa-Nedelcu, R. (2024). Impact of maladaptive cognitive schemas on suicidal behavior in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: a predictive study. International Journal of Social Psychological Aspects of Healthcare, 4, 42–46. doi:10.51847/EHCf9HzLEP
Dong, Q., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., & Fang, D. (2019). Dynamic management of a water resources-socioeconomic-environmental system based on feedbacks using system dynamics. Water Resources Management, 33, 2093–2108. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02233-8
Dong, Q., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., & Fang, D. (2019). Dynamic management of a water resources-socioeconomic-environmental system based on feedbacks using system dynamics. Water Resources Management, 33, 2093–2108. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02233-8
Du, X., Dong, Q., Sun, L., Chen, X., & Jiang, J. (2023). Studying the relationship between depression and internal stigma in mothers of children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care, 4, 17–22. doi:10.51847/9WQmf9zDW1
Elamin, S. M., Redzuan, A. M., Aziz, S. A. A., Hamdan, S., Masmuzidin, M. Z., & Shah, N. M. (2023). Educational impact on glycemic outcomes among children and adolescents diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Medical Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research, 3(1), 41–64. doi:10.51847/s5KgRZ9e1O
Fabolude, G., Knoble, C., Vu, A., & Yu, D. (2024). A comprehensive review of system dynamics model applications in urban studies in the big data era. Geography and Sustainability, 5(3), 460–475. doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.03.005
Ferraz, M. P. (2024). Comparative evaluation of oral wound dressing materials: a comprehensive clinical review. Annals of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapy, 4, 51–56. doi:10.51847/pEkEpZ0DjV
Fong, W. K., Sotos, M., Doust, M., Schultz, S., Marques, A., & Deng-Beck, C. (2022). Global protocol for community-scale greenhouse gas emission inventories. World Resources Institute.
Galvin, R., & Healy, N. (2020). The green new deal in the united states: what it is and how to pay for it. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 101529. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101529
Gladkykh, G. (2021). Connecting Energy System modelling with Sustainable Energy System.
Hou, C. (2024). Analysis of the factors promoting urban green productivity using a system dynamics simulation. Scientific Reports, 14, 27928. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-13699-5
Iftode, C., Iurciuc, S., Marcovici, I., Macasoi, I., Coricovac, D., Dehelean, C., Ursoniu, S., Rusu, A., & Ardelean, S. (2024). Therapeutic potential of aspirin repurposing in colon cancer. Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Design, 4, 43–50. doi:10.51847/nyDxRaP7Au
Kantakumar, L. N., Kumar, S., & Schneider, K. (2019). SUSM: a scenario-based urban growth simulation model using remote sensing data. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 52(sup2), 26–41. doi:10.1080/22797254.2019.1585209
Karatzas, S., Lazari, V., & Kassa, I. (2025). Assessing Urban Development Patterns Using a System Dynamics Approach. Preprints. doi:10.20944/preprints202508.1356.v1
Khashashneh, M., Ratnayake, J., Choi, J. J. E., Mei, L., Lyons, K., & Brunton, P. (2023). Comparative effectiveness and safety of low- vs high-concentration carbamide peroxide for dental bleaching: a systematic review. Annals of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapy, 3, 21–27. doi:10.51847/hE26QqCyuQ
Kim, S., Bae, H., & Kim, H. (2024). A diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma: giant multifocal retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma with dual heterologous components. Archives of International Journal of Cancer Allied Sciences, 4(2), 1–5. doi:10.51847/5JnC3jAkZz
Ku, J. K., Um, I. W., Jun, M. K., & Kim, I. H. (2023). Clinical management of external apical root resorption using amnion membrane matrix and bio dentine. Journal of Current Research in Oral Surgery, 3, 1–5. doi:10.51847/lOSwt6Qzpv
Lee, S., Kim, J., & Byun, G. (2023). The interplay of political skill, ethical leadership, and leader-member exchange in shaping work outcomes. Annals of Organizational Culture, Communications and Leadership, 4, 45–53. doi:10.51847/vAKE892Paf
Li, C. X., Zhang, L., Yan, Y. R., Ding, Y. J., Lin, Y. N., Zhou, J. P., Li, N., Li, H. P., Li, S. Q., Sun, X. W., et al. (2024). Exploring advanced diagnostic techniques for salivary gland disorders: a narrative overview. Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.51847/uN2cjdmOP8
Li, G., Kou, C., Wang, Y., & Yang, H. (2020). System dynamics modelling for improving urban resilience in Beijing, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104913. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104913
Li, X., Wang, G., Zhu, Y., & Liu, W. (2024). A system dynamics-based simulation study on urban traffic congestion mitigation and emission reduction policies. Sustainability, 16(20), 9296. doi:10.3390/su16209296
Liu, H., Xie, X., & Chen, Q. (2024). Determinants of practice: exploring healthcare providers’ beliefs and recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation in China. Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety and Public Health Advocacy, 4, 63–74. doi:10.51847/UcQWoStr3h
Liu, Y., Ma, Y., & Lou, K. (2024). Urban development scenario simulation and model research based on system dynamics from the perspective of effect and efficiency. Systems, 12(7), 259. doi:10.3390/systems12070259
Manole, F., Mekeres, G. M., & Davidescu, L. (2023). Genetic insights into allergic rhinitis: a comprehensive review. Interdisciplinary Research in Medical Sciences Special, 3(1), 39–44. doi:10.51847/GDXePBjkMJ
Muresan, G. C., Hedesiu, M., Lucaciu, O., Boca, S., & Petrescu, N. (2023). Evaluation of bone turnover indicators before dental implant insertion in osteoporotic patients: a case-control investigation. Journal of Current Research in Oral Surgery, 3, 27–32. doi:10.51847/P4EfMAbJVb
Ncube, M., Sibanda, M., & Matenda, F. R. (2023). The influence of ai and the pandemic on BRICS Nations: South Africa’s economic performance during crisis. Annals of Organizational Culture, Communications and Leadership, 4, 17–24. doi:10.51847/lrMvYTE3OF
Nkosi, T., & Dlamini, A. (2023). Limited predictive performance of existing amisulpride poppk models: external validation and proposal of model-based remedial regimens for non-adherence. Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Design, 3, 53–66. doi:10.51847/iAz1QEBpk0
Nugroho, S., & Uehara, T. (2023). Systematic review of agent-based and system dynamics models for social-ecological system case studies. Systems, 11(11), 530. doi:10.3390/systems11110530
Osluf, A. S. H., Shoukeer, M., & Almarzoog, N. A. (2024). Case report on persistent fetal vasculature accompanied by congenital hydrocephalus. Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer, 4(1), 25–30. doi:10.51847/0gjOEudJNr
Pejic Bach, M., Tustanovski, E., Ip, A. W. H., & Yung, K. L. (2020). System dynamics models for the simulation of sustainable urban development: a review and analysis and the stakeholder perspective. Kybernetes, 49(2), 460–504. doi:10.1108/K-04-2018-0210
Pejic Bach, M., Tustanovski, E., Ip, A. W. H., Yung, K. L., & Roblek, V. (2019). System dynamics models for the simulation of sustainable urban development: a review. Kybernetes, 49(2), 460–504. doi:10.1108/K-04-2018-0210
Schünemann, C., Johanning, S., Reger, E., Herold, H., & Bruckner, T. (2024). Complex system policy modelling approaches for policy advice – comparing systems thinking, system dynamics and agent-based modelling. Political Research Exchange, 6(1), 2387438. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2024.2387438
Sonbol, H. S. (2023). Nutritional proteomics: a pathway to understanding and optimizing human health. Journal of Medical Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research, 3(2), 45–64. doi:10.51847/SnZlWLL5go
Su, Z., Qin, M., & Hu, D. (2024). Impact of lecture versus group discussion-based ethics training on nurses’ moral reasoning, distress, and sensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 4, 81–96. doi:10.51847/iBvPMrJSLE
Tabassum, M., Ayub, F., Tanveer, K., Ramzan, M., Bukhsh, A., Mohammed, Z. M., & Khan, T. M. (2023). Quality-of-life assessment in musculoskeletal disorder patients, Lahore, Pakistan. Bulletin of Pioneer Research in Medical and Clinical Sciences, 3(1), 17–24. doi:10.51847/QVOwcxjCwX
Tâlvan, E., Budișan, L., Mohor, C. I., Grecu, V., Berindan-Neagoe, I., Cristea, V., Oprinca, G., & Cristian, A. (2023). Interconnected dynamics among inflammation, immunity, and cancer–from tumor suppression to tumor onset, promotion, and progression. Archives of International Journal of Cancer Allied Sciences, 3(1), 25–28. doi:10.51847/nbSWsJHJMZ
Tan, Y., Jiao, L., Shuai, C., & Shen, L. (2018). A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: a China case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 844–862. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154
Uneno, Y., Morita, T., Watanabe, Y., Okamoto, S., Kawashima, N., & Muto, M. (2024). Assessing the supportive care needs of elderly cancer patients at seirei mikatahara general hospital in 2023. International Journal of Social Psychological Aspects of Healthcare, 4, 13–19. doi:10.51847/o4njwxvRSF
Vinichenko, V., Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and electricity: a system dynamics approach.
Welman, A., & Chima, M. D. (2023). Respecting autonomy in african communities: traditional beliefs and challenges for informed consent in South Africa. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 3, 1–16. doi:10.51847/KmUs6uzoc1
Wu, M., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Modeling, assessment, and optimization of urban sustainability using probabilistic system dynamics. Journal of Building Design and Environment, 1, 89–93. doi:10.37155/2811-0730-0101-5
Yeomans, J. S., & Kozlova, M. (2023). Extending system dynamics modeling using simulation decomposition to improve the urban planning process. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1129316. doi:10.3389/frsc.2023.1129316
Zhang, Y., He, X., He, Q., & Oki, T. (2022). A system dynamics model to evaluate historical and future trend of water scarcity in Beijing. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), 034019. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4e86
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
